(Untitled)

Aug 14, 2008 20:51

What would you do if TQC set a new rule where for every new member, somebody had to leave the community?

How would we decide who stays and who goes?

Update: What if all the pic posters/lurkers came out and participated so you couldn't just go by 'people who don't participate'?

[qa], tqc post

Leave a comment

Comments 18

la_fiora August 15 2008, 03:09:51 UTC
...people who don't actually participate go.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

la_fiora August 15 2008, 03:11:10 UTC
that was easy.

Reply


slinksgirl August 15 2008, 03:10:06 UTC
The answer is always a DEATH MATCH.

Reply


shinga August 15 2008, 03:10:14 UTC
Everyone who only posts on pic posts gets booted. The end.

Reply

dancingants August 15 2008, 03:12:58 UTC
This

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

shinga August 15 2008, 03:17:28 UTC
... And only if they're really good nudes.

Reply


artfuldodger August 15 2008, 03:14:18 UTC
Oo, oo, I want to decide who lives and who dies!

We'd have to make an elaborate tier system, which we would always refer to in casual passing, but when it all came down to it, we'd never actually use it for its intended purpose, and would boot all the photo-post-only people.

Reply


opheliaheart August 15 2008, 03:22:03 UTC
BAR BRAWLS ARE ALWAYS THE ANSWER

TO THE DEATH

Reply

haydenmac August 15 2008, 03:59:51 UTC
I prefer "To the pain." So that every shriek of every child at seeing your hideousness will be yours to cherish, every babe that weeps at your approach, every woman who cries out: "Dear God, what is that thing?" will echo in your perfect ears. That is what "to the pain" means. It means I leave you in anguish, wallowing in freakish misery, forever.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up