I see what you are saying. Funny. No, I think they may be looking at DNA from a molecular biology standpoint. Developmental hormones and proteins will allow neurons to grow a certain way in an organism. Furthermore, once developed DNA makes proteins that support (or do not support) neurological structures. Then once developed there is a certain impulse conduction and frequency nerves along the given tract with produce.
Now if that isn't enough there are fields of science called genomics and proteomics (Particularly pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics). These fields look a how your genetics (DNA) or proteins (RNA) work in your body (or do not work as the case may be). This homeostasis effects how some drugs interact with your system, how some endogenous macromolecules interact with your system, and even how your system (receptors, tissues) will respond to such stimuli.
This may be why different people react differently to medications, disease states, allergens, etc. Compound these medications with the 'normal operation' of a woman's sexual physiology (and anatomy) and you have a real conundrum. Women have a response where endogenous compounds move through their body and electrophysiologic impulses stimulate areas through sensory transduction.
Now you can ponder on the interactions between DNA, electrophysiology, anatomy, behavior, sensory transduction (from all the senses), hormones, proteins, blood flow, endogenous (and exogenous) compounds, thought stimulation (turn ons), etc. but I think the key these Brits are looking at here is --> What conditions are required for an orgasm to occur?
Which path they take I don't know: Molecular biology, developmental biology, electrophysiology, pharmacogenomics, bioproteomics, etc? Looks like a fascinating field to be researching.
I did like in the article how Spector speculated (say that five times fast) how orgasm may be a stimulus to make conditions conducive (I'm your alliteration assistant anon)to fertility.
I see what you are saying. Funny. No, I think they may be looking at DNA from a molecular biology standpoint. Developmental hormones and proteins will allow neurons to grow a certain way in an organism. Furthermore, once developed DNA makes proteins that support (or do not support) neurological structures. Then once developed there is a certain impulse conduction and frequency nerves along the given tract with produce.
Now if that isn't enough there are fields of science called genomics and proteomics (Particularly pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics). These fields look a how your genetics (DNA) or proteins (RNA) work in your body (or do not work as the case may be). This homeostasis effects how some drugs interact with your system, how some endogenous macromolecules interact with your system, and even how your system (receptors, tissues) will respond to such stimuli.
This may be why different people react differently to medications, disease states, allergens, etc. Compound these medications with the 'normal operation' of a woman's sexual physiology (and anatomy) and you have a real conundrum. Women have a response where endogenous compounds move through their body and electrophysiologic impulses stimulate areas through sensory transduction.
Now you can ponder on the interactions between DNA, electrophysiology, anatomy, behavior, sensory transduction (from all the senses), hormones, proteins, blood flow, endogenous (and exogenous) compounds, thought stimulation (turn ons), etc. but I think the key these Brits are looking at here is --> What conditions are required for an orgasm to occur?
Which path they take I don't know: Molecular biology, developmental biology, electrophysiology, pharmacogenomics, bioproteomics, etc? Looks like a fascinating field to be researching.
I did like in the article how Spector speculated (say that five times fast) how orgasm may be a stimulus to make conditions conducive (I'm your alliteration assistant anon)to fertility.
word,
toxins
PS Inadvertent study for comps...heh
Reply
Leave a comment