There are some glaring inaccuraties in that text. For starters, you (since you apparently agree with it) create two sides; white and non-whites. How on earth does that make sense? As if all whites are agreeing with each other and as if Jews have anything to do with blacks, beyond being a supressed minority. Secondly, as a history enthusiast, I should point out that Catholic Europe was more or less responsible for the crusades. In one instance, they slew everything living within the walls of Jerusalem, for example.
Then, you conclude with 'sieg heil', as you usually do, but it sets a wrong image. In the text, which makes some good points, you try to strife for equality. Well, mostly anyway, since the text tries to use reason and reason must be abandoned if a cultural group tries to prove its superiority. However, your own statement immediately puts the text into another context, namely that of white superiority.
Therefore, you betray most of the reasonable points made in the text.
Disclaimer: The words 'blacks' and 'whites' are simply words used to signify a cultural group.
Then, you conclude with 'sieg heil', as you usually do, but it sets a wrong image. In the text, which makes some good points, you try to strife for equality. Well, mostly anyway, since the text tries to use reason and reason must be abandoned if a cultural group tries to prove its superiority. However, your own statement immediately puts the text into another context, namely that of white superiority.
Therefore, you betray most of the reasonable points made in the text.
Disclaimer: The words 'blacks' and 'whites' are simply words used to signify a cultural group.
Reply
Leave a comment