Going Galt

Apr 13, 2009 22:33

Libertarians and tax reform advocates have been advocating going Galt. Named after John Galt from Atlas Shrugged, Galt and his fellow individualist captains of industry "go on strike" by withdrawing his entrepreneurial talents from the collectivist common men whose socialist governments and progressive tax structure did not provide sufficient ( Read more... )

ayn rand, tax

Leave a comment

mcfnord April 14 2009, 15:05:46 UTC
I am on the last chapter of Atlas Shrugged, and find comparasons to the book overblown.

Last year I did decide to quit when I hit the 25% tax rate. It seemed too annoying that one day I paid a dime more on each dollar. So I did go Galt b4 it was popular.

This year I won't have this problem.

Reply

cdk April 14 2009, 15:20:01 UTC
Why not stop when you exhaust the standard deduction, then? Same dime hike on the next dollar there.

Reply

mcfnord April 14 2009, 16:08:28 UTC
i itemize. i've done some cool stuff with consumer credit when it was free though. i could max out my 401k while staying in the 10% rate.

Reply

cdk April 14 2009, 16:29:54 UTC
Ok, but still, you likely encountered a point where the last dollar you earned was not taxed, and the next dollar you earned would be taxed at or near 10%. At some point, the next dollar you earned was going to give you a dime less than the previous one. Why is that a different situation?

Reply

mcfnord April 14 2009, 16:34:15 UTC
because i don't wanna be so damn poor!

Reply

crisper April 14 2009, 18:01:03 UTC
So... you don't want to be so damn poor that the complete absence of taxes won't help you, but you don't want to be so rich that paying some extra taxes won't hurt you?

Reply

mcfnord April 15 2009, 00:21:25 UTC
I wanna be doing something other than going to work. I always feel this way.

Reply

mister_borogove April 14 2009, 16:36:20 UTC
So you're saying that, at the margin, you'd rather take $0 than take $0.75 plus a microscopically better system of highways, microscopically stronger national defense, microscopically better health care for the elderly, etc.?

Reply

mcfnord April 14 2009, 16:50:19 UTC
Well yeah because that $0 means I get to have some fun. And that's why someone told me I wasn't really Going Galt: Because I wasn't going on strike. I was just doin my own thing, having a balanced life. I prefer to think I "responded to incentives".

Reply

edxter April 15 2009, 00:05:05 UTC
Interesting use of the word "think".

Reply

mcfnord April 15 2009, 00:18:20 UTC
What makes objectivist gold nuts into insufferable dicks, is what i wanna know.

Reply

edxter April 15 2009, 00:28:42 UTC
A combination of unshakeable certainty, bad logic, and non-existent evidence.

Reply

tongodeon April 15 2009, 00:32:22 UTC
I've actually been working on a really good post that answers this question, but I'm trying to make sure I've got it all right because I know a lot of people whose feathers it's going to ruffle.

Reply

ikkyu2 April 15 2009, 06:29:17 UTC
Our money.

Reply

mmcirvin April 15 2009, 01:25:16 UTC
You're not going Galt, you're just taking it easy. Good on you.

Many of the people who claim to be "going Galt" seem to think that the essence of it is to be a lousy tipper.

Reply

tongodeon April 14 2009, 18:02:30 UTC
So you're saying that, at the margin, you'd rather take home $28,068.75 rather than $52,950.00 because the government won't let you take home $56,267.50? You're willing to forego $24,881.25 in extra income rather than forego $3,317.50 in extra taxes?

I guess there are some things that I'd do for $56.26/hr that I wouldn't do for $52.95/hr, but if my professional livelihood was skating that close to the border of intolerability I'd think the real problem would be my line of work not tax brackets.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up