Summing up my SwanCon opinions

Jan 29, 2010 21:26

1. More panels relating to specific fandoms (ie. particular authors, shows, etc) are better than having an overabundance of vague, "general" panels ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

angriest January 29 2010, 15:06:37 UTC
Just wanted to say:

1. Yes, ish. I think general themed panels are great if they have a good critical question to be answered at their centre, and have really good panelists.
2. Yes.
3. Yes. This one is really striking me as weird at the moment, because I swear to god this battle was fought and won in 2008.
4. Yes. We had a kid's program in 2008 and 2009. Isn't it the Swancon rule that two times means it's a tradition?
5. Yes. I really like the idea I saw mentioned of trying to move the memberships desk to the front of the con wherever possible. (All Seasons is a bit tricky in this regard, but not impossible.)
6. Yes.
7. They did the $50 membership for newcomers back in 2004 and it went well from memory.
8. Yes.
9. Oh probably. : )
10. Me too! (Assuming I haven't got a job outside of Perth!)
6.

Reply

tommmo January 29 2010, 15:11:31 UTC
Re: #1 - see my reply to alias_sqbr below, where I say pretty much the same thing. The important thing is that the panels have focus and direction.

Reply

tommmo January 29 2010, 15:12:47 UTC
And by "below" I of course mean "above" ;)

Reply

angriest January 29 2010, 15:21:17 UTC
I find most panels fall into two categories: critical and appreciative.

I went through a phase of thinking appreciative panels, which are generally either loose celebrations (the Buffy Panel, the Why Spider-Man is Awesome panel) or lists (Best SF Movies of the Year, Trailer Park), should be discouraged, but then I realised they're often the easiest items for newcomers to engage with and participate in.

These days I think there should be a balance - always program something nice and critical opposite something light and appreciative.

Reply

tommmo January 29 2010, 15:31:33 UTC
Well, I'd say that even appreciative panels should have some kind of direction to them. A panel whose topic is nothing more than "The Buffy Panel" isn't much of a panel at all, in my opinion - those are the ones that often devolve into random chatter and burn out after 20 mins without having said much of interest. As long as the topic has a focal point, then its all good.

Reply

logansrogue January 30 2010, 04:01:42 UTC
I want my Xena panel to be both critical AND appreciative.

Reply

angriest January 30 2010, 04:31:05 UTC
Are you doing a Xena panel this year? (If so, awesome!!)

Reply

logansrogue January 30 2010, 04:44:42 UTC
Yes. This is a thing that will happen.

Reply

callistra January 30 2010, 04:48:32 UTC
Ooo, I forgot to get this to you:
http://community.livejournal.com/swancon/147516.html

Plus, there's a picnic tomorrow where Julian should be at for listening to panel ideas. If you like, you send me notes etc I can let him know what you want to do. Otherwise, it would be lovely to see you there
:-)

Reply

angriest January 30 2010, 04:57:36 UTC
Did you see Lucy Lawless has a new show, Spartacus.

Only seen one preview scene, which appeared to be Lawless and The Mummy's John Hannah shagging with the aid of fluffers. A bit disturbing.

Reply

logansrogue January 30 2010, 05:10:59 UTC
Not overly impressed with what I've heard. I don't trust Rob Tapert as far as I can comfortably spit a rat and I'm sick of him putting LL in TV shows for the sole purpose of having her wander around half-naked. It was really bloody gratuitous in the sixth season of Xena, and in Spartacus, he doesn't even bother with feminism. Who fuckin' cares? Let's go for the tits.

But I am a bitter Xena fan who is pissed at RT for a lot of things, so I'm not the person to talk to. Bring up that stuff, I will rant for ages and it will bore you shitless. :-P

Reply


Leave a comment

Up