Comments | tobascofish: The Tomb of the Dark Mummy Knight named Wall-E

tobascofish

The Tomb of the Dark Mummy Knight named Wall-E

Aug 02, 2008 22:03

That's right, I'm reviewing movies again. My scoring has changed along with every other reviewer on the planet. The highest score is a 4 now, thank you Roger Ebert. This one's gonna be a threefer because it heralds my triumphant return from wherever it is I've been lately. So here goes:

THE MUMMY: TOMB OF THE DRAGON EMPEROR

Ok let's start off ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

yo yaccats August 3 2008, 14:29:44 UTC

first of all: i agree with your movies reviews totally (expect for 3rd mummy cause i haven't seen it, and now i might not at all).

Second: i don't know how much you into graphic noval but if you like creepy joker, then you should read "the killing joke." Its ever so creepy jokeer.

well thats it for now

Re: yo sector_1417 August 3 2008, 16:05:31 UTC

I agree as well with your reviews ( ... )

Re: yo dwarfwitahammer August 4 2008, 07:14:44 UTC

There won't be a "I thought you were dead!" moment. However, I hope that there's a moment where its like
"Holy crap that was Harvey Dent!!"
"Harvey Dent's dead, man. Besides, we just almost got killed by Two Face!!"

It would be interesting to see the people of gotham not recognizing their white knight.

Also, I found a way to use the Joker without ledger.

Harleen Quinzel, Joker's therapist in Arkham, loses it upon his death (he'd have to die off screen), and becomes Harley Quinn. She does things in his name, and in the end, she kidnaps an innocent man and tortures him to the breaking point, cutting his face and turning him into the new Joker.

I'm not saying they SHOULD, but it would work.

Re: yo tobascofish August 4 2008, 14:11:06 UTC

There's already talk of having The Riddler and The Penguin in the next film. So I suppose they could do that in a fourth one, but I think the original plan was to do a different villain for each film at least until most of the villains were used and then they could have a break out of Arkham movie or something.

Your idea would work in a continuity sense, but I don't think audiences would like it.

Re: yo dwarfwitahammer August 4 2008, 18:36:56 UTC

I had heard Nolan said he'd never do the Penguin, cuz he didn't think it would work.

He also went on record saying he'd prefer, from here on, to do villains who haven't had movies yet. There's a whole world of obscure batman villains out there, after all...

And as far as my Two-Face thing, it would be like the Scarecrow's cameo.

Re: yo sector_1417 August 4 2008, 23:36:22 UTC

The Last Rumor I heard was Raz was going to appear in the next film. But I think they should Give Bane a second shot cause i am sorry his role in B&R was so shitty no one would be able to connect it to a Bane done RIGHT.

My Vote would be on Mad Hatter, Killer Croc (he is in Gotham Knight), Scarface, or Clayface

Re: yo dwarfwitahammer August 5 2008, 18:28:04 UTC

they wont do any of those, except MAYBE for Bane. Croc is too superpowered to be realistic, as is Mind Control (Mad Hatter). Scarface is too silly, and unless they did the ORIGINAL Clayface (pissed off actor with a lot of makeup and masks), they couldnt.

Bane could just be a juicer ganglord.

Re: yo tobascofish August 6 2008, 03:36:05 UTC

Well let's see... According to IMDB PROFESSIONAL the latest news about the next movie's casting is:

Depp To Play The Riddler?
31 July 2008 (WENN) <- (the World Entertainment News Network ( ... )

Back to all threads