Edited: I made this public because people have linked to it, and I had it as local friends-only. Apologies to people who aren't from these parts, but I didn't want folks to follow a non-functional link. NOTE: This is about a ballot proposal in the State of Michigan, in the US. If you don't live here, please don't use it as a guide for your own
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
Reply
That is not true. You've fallen for a PR fantasy created by opponents of the amendment.
Allow me to quote the entire amendment: "The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting."
As many times as I've read that by now, I still can't find any word or phrase that would have any effect on private scholarships, charities or social services. In fact the language strictly limits the amendment to public employment, public education and public contracting.
Reply
Reply
However, if there are state funded scholarships, they will go to who ever is most qualified regardless of race or sex. As it should be with public money.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm going to be so glad when the TV isn't full of lying, brutal ads from both sides...
Reply
Reply
For some background that may explain my personal comments at the end, here's a National Public Radio piece summarizing the court rulings in the admissions lawsuits. Those suits are what led the national organization against affirmative action (I forget what they're called) to pick Michigan as its next battleground.
Oh, yes -- the campaign in favor of Proposal 2 has been heavily, and almost exclusively, funded and masterminded from out of state.
Reply
Leave a comment