Oh AFA, how you crack me up!
I just got another email from the American Family Association, this time back on their favourite topic: The Gay Agenda. And liberal activist judges.
Dear ,
U.S. Senator Roger Wicker has introduced the Marriage Protection Amendment in the U.S. Senate. This constitutional amendment would keep liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on every American.
This constitutional amendment simply states: “Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.”
Liberal activist judges in Massachusetts and California, each by a 4-3 margin, have already forced homosexual marriage on their citizens! There is nothing in current law which would keep one judge from legalizing marriage between three men, or two men and four women, or any other combination.
The only way to stop other liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on Americans is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That is why your action now is so critical.
The best line from this email comes at the end of the first paragraph. It is boldfaced, and reads: "This constitutional amendment would keep liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on every American."
Two immediate thoughts arise: (1) again with the "liberal activist judges"! I hope they give out t-shirts with that slogan; and (2) "forcing homosexual marriage on every American"? Do they at least get to choose whom they are forcibly partnered with?
Two words, of course: box turtle.
Dear ,
U.S. Senator Roger Wicker has introduced the Marriage Protection Amendment in the U.S. Senate. This constitutional amendment would keep liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on every American.
This constitutional amendment simply states: “Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.”
Liberal activist judges in Massachusetts and California, each by a 4-3 margin, have already forced homosexual marriage on their citizens! There is nothing in current law which would keep one judge from legalizing marriage between three men, or two men and four women, or any other combination.
The only way to stop other liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on Americans is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That is why your action now is so critical.
The best line from this email comes at the end of the first paragraph. It is boldfaced, and reads: "This constitutional amendment would keep liberal activist judges from forcing homosexual marriage on every American."
Two immediate thoughts arise: (1) again with the "liberal activist judges"! I hope they give out t-shirts with that slogan; and (2) "forcing homosexual marriage on every American"? Do they at least get to choose whom they are forcibly partnered with?
Two words, of course: box turtle.