Understanding [14/17]

Jun 04, 2008 23:02

Title: Understanding [14/17]
Rating: NC-17 overall

Pairing/Characters: Mohinder/Sylar, Ensemble

Spoilers: Seasons 1 & 2, and some of the online comics.
Warnings: None! This part is rated PG-13 for mild language only.

This Time: Sylar ponders his situation and his next move, while Mohinder is forced to deal with Peter's concern.

A/N: The delay ( Read more... )

character: peter petrelli, pairing: mohinder/sylar, fandom: heroes, story: understanding, character: sylar, character: mohinder suresh

Leave a comment

eridanie June 5 2008, 07:51:41 UTC
FINALLY!
I am so enthralled with this series that I was even able to overlook the use of an illogically double negative word that I hate, and that's saying a lot cuz I let pointless little logical details wig me out with a fairly neurotic frequency ie. obsessive comment lecturing on lube with megmathews20.
I love the interesting direction this is going in, both of them thinking about each other all the time, and I'm anxious to see how Sylar is going to save the world. I loved Peter and Mohinder's conversation, but I can see why a whip wouldn't have worked for forcing that conversation, oh well.
Great job :D I hope the next one is easier.

Reply

neshel June 6 2008, 02:32:13 UTC
An illogically double negative word? There was a double negative in Mo's dialog that I have now removed after reading this comment the first time (I sorta meant too anyway but I waffled and then I was tired), but speech doesn't comply to grammar rules and, um, was that even what you were talking about?

*twitch* I'm not a perfectionist.... noooo.... *fails*

Heh, ya, whip therapy was a nice idea, but this require finesse. That and, apparently, a 5 hour wait in an empty train station. XD

^_^ Thank you so much and, god, so do I. Except that I've realized that pretty much every character I've written into this so far is going to be in the next chapter and um... well it should be interesting to see how it goes.

Reply

eridanie June 6 2008, 06:31:11 UTC
I know speech doesn't conform, and it's a totally acceptable, if nonstandard word, It's just me who has the problem, cuz my brain works too literally,
Irregardless; the prefix ir- meaning not, and the suffix -less meaning without, it actually comes down to meaning not without regard, ultimately meaning with regard too, which I think is the opposite of what was meant. But it is always used in the way you used it in common speech, and my hatred for it is unwarranted unless I want to associate only in snobby academic circles. So don't worry it's totally on me for being a freak :D
I can't wait to see the next one

Reply

eridanie June 6 2008, 06:35:06 UTC
crap that was me (of couse) I have no idea how it became anonymous. sorry.

Reply

neshel June 10 2008, 16:15:10 UTC
I actually googled irregardless to get the low-down on it. Seems its becoming pretty common (which explains how it infiltrated my brain), but as a perfectionist (who has no shame about this fact) I have come to realize that you're totally right and have edited the "ir" out.

YAY!

Reply

eridanie June 10 2008, 20:13:30 UTC
I too am a perfectionist, and will probably be the last holdout against the rest of society in matters like these, but now I am pleased that I have convinced someone else too see my way of thinking about this word *g*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up