(no subject)

Mar 25, 2007 00:06



You are looking at the RapeX anti-rape condom. In South Africa rape numbers are appallingly high, so it is no real surprise that the country that brought you anti-carjacking flamethrowers, would also be the home of this product's inventor.

Per this news article, it's about to hit the market after a long time of waiting for patent verification, and is going to be be mass-produced in China next month.

The Wikipedia article has this to say:The anti-rape female condom (aka anti-rape condom, intended brand name Rapex) was invented by Sonette Ehlers, a South African woman. It is intended to prevent rape by hooking onto an attacker's penis, hurting and disabling him.

The device is a latex sheath held firm by shafts of sharp, inward-facing microscopic barbs that would be worn by a woman in her vagina like a tampon. Should an attacker attempt vaginal rape, the penis would penetrate the latex and be hooked by the barbs, causing the attacker pain and (ideally) giving the victim time to escape. The condom would remain attached to the attacker's body and could be removed only surgically, which would alert hospital staff and police.

The Rapex would also act as a regular female condom, reducing chances of impregnation or STD infection. The device was unveiled on August 31, 2005 in rape-ridden South Africa.
And this criticism:Critics, women included, have objected to Ehler's invention as "medieval" and "vengeful, horrible, and disgusting" [1] and oppose its planned sale in drugstores. Since the wearer of the condom exhibits no visible signals that she is using the condom, there is no visible deterrence for a prospective attacker, which adds to criticisms that the device is vindictive. Of course, this concern for the well-being of a violent rapist has garnered even harsher responses from proponents of the device in the blogosphere. However, the device has furthermore caused concern that it could be worn for consensual sex as part of a malicious act of revenge or outright cruelty. Others fear that use of the device would enrage the attacker and further jeopardize the victim.
I have little sympathy for rapists and it is those final two lines that trouble me most, particularly the last line. Rape is a crime of violence after all, and this could make that worse. I'm not sure how I feel about this. How does it strike you?

I kept meaning to post about this. A couple of you have made reference to it. Thanks to erisofdiscordia for the recent news link.

human rights, sa, feminism, news

Previous post Next post
Up