even all good things--

Nov 16, 2004 09:26



Read more... )

Leave a comment

jahpraise November 16 2004, 09:10:17 UTC
In all seriousness, this is what experts from Time Magazine have drawn up as what Jesus may actually have looked like:


... )

Reply

thusdavid November 16 2004, 09:37:17 UTC
That pic was in Popular Mechanics, not Time.
I mean, it may have been in Time, but it's from an article from Popular Mechanics.
I have the issue at my home if you wanna read it. It's pretty cool.

Reply

jahpraise November 16 2004, 11:06:20 UTC
It must've been in both, because I read a long expository in Time about what Jesus would've actually looked like, and this was the "reconstruction" at the end.

Reply

thusdavid November 16 2004, 13:40:55 UTC
Wanna try something eerie? Play our demo recording of "For Glenda" and see how oddly it syncs up to your icon.

Reply

davrtayl November 16 2004, 11:15:20 UTC
i knew He was Jewish!!!!

Reply

xrageofangelsx November 17 2004, 18:02:43 UTC
That's just like postulating what Elijah looked like.

In other words, we have no fucking clue.

Is postulating the right word?

Reply

jahpraise November 18 2004, 09:04:36 UTC
Tell that to Time Magazine.

postulating is a correct word, but certainly not the only one, loser!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up