Autism In Right Wing Men
I've been stewing on this a long time, and it's getting to the point where I'm going to start trolling. As much as I agree with most of the stuff posted on right wing sites, there are a few things about some of the men that bug me. The biggest thing is the SEXISM. I get that feminism has caused a lot of damage to our culture, -what with no-fault divorce and one parent households- but maybe all the problems of the world shouldn't be blamed solely on women. Maybe it's not 100% the female's fault for why an unhygienic, Asperger-riddled incel neckbeard can't get a date. Some of them sound indistinguishable from radical Muslims. No, women aren't unclean in a religious sense or (this one makes me laugh the most) HYPERSEXUALISED.
Radical Muslims are the biggest hypocrites, btw. The same people who throw gays off roofs will think it's okay to go home and screw a boy chained to a bed, as if that's more morally-sound than two grown, consenting adults with penises choosing to have sexual relations. Women are not hypersexualized and don't need to be saved from themselves. Sex drive is tied to testosterone production. Sure, there might be a few insatiable whores with psychological issues out there, but I'd think that women are ninety nine out of a hundred times more likely to identify as ace-gray-demisexual and be into fanfiction than men. Women make better nuns than men make priests because women are better at being celibate.
Side note: A couple of times I saw some really sexist men on the Facebook forums talk about how they aren't into church girls because it's the wild women who can be tamed to embrace their 'yin nature'. This makes me think they're the male versions of those women who will go after the most simian of bad boys thinking she can reform him, only to walk away with a black eye and a fatherless child. -Only in the man's case, he'll hook up with a raunchy, bipolar flea-bitten skank thinking he's going to reform her into a fantasy housewife who will suck his dick on demand and party on the weekends, only to end up with itchy balls and eighteen years of child support because the baby is already made by the time he figures out that she isn't going to 'embrace her yin nature' (do exactly what he wants) therefore is impossible to live with. I work with two right-wing guys who fit that bill. They'll be nice to the two-dollar whores with children from several different ex-boyfriends, yet look down on me for being a bit quirky, even though I like to cook, clean, take care of children, be faithful...and all that other traditional gender role crap that men are always complaining enough women aren't into. -And that's why they are going to die alone and deserve to.
Finally, there are the dog weirdos. This is something more often found on the left, but people on the right aren't immune to it. They are the people who will identify more with animals than people and think it's an aspect of good, noble character to be able to bond with a dog because they are 'faithful animals who were bred to love you' (actually, if you were to die while they are locked in with you, they will eat your dead body before you start to smell, and if you shit yourself on the way out, they'll start there). Just yesterday, somebody posted on the Anti-SJW site on Facebook a story about a five year old girl who was bitten in the face by someones 'emotional support pitbull'. I saw several comments similar to this:
You'll see a flood of neckbeards on those posts put up pictures of their pitbulls sleeping on dog beds peacefully while talking about how great they are, and how someone wasn't watching their child well enough. I have been trolling the hell out of them. Other people have the same idea, trolling them with macros about how 'a heroic pitbull entered a burning house/swam a hundred miles to bite a child'.
To combine the two ideas together, I've seen some right-wingers put up posts about how 'men are more canine/women are more feline'. The dog people have this weird rivalry with cat-people where they think cats are literally agents of satan, so of course a woman is like a cat that is like everything bad about the world.
If that ever comes up again, I've thought of a subtle way to troll them. I'll write that if you anthropomorphize dogs and cats into MTBI personalities, then dogs would be like Extroverted Feelers, whereas cats would be Introverted Thinkers. The EF dog would be more expressive with its affections the way it will jump and slobber all over someone, whereas the IT cat might just give a chirp and a head butt on a good day, but mostly might just wink across the room. A lot of shallow, stupid idiots might interpret that as one being more capable of affection than the other. IT Cat would be more likely to think before it acted. Ever see a cat wiggle its cat butt around for like forever before it pounces? Now, EF Dog will often have impulse-control problems, like how a dog that has never bitten anybody in its life might suddenly see a ten year child bending over to tie his/her shoes as a threat and bite half his/her lip off. It will also snarf down a steaming pile of crap before something it its brain has time to fire off, "Hey...THAT'S SHIT."
Thought I'd wake this place up after a while. This resonate with anybody?
Radical Muslims are the biggest hypocrites, btw. The same people who throw gays off roofs will think it's okay to go home and screw a boy chained to a bed, as if that's more morally-sound than two grown, consenting adults with penises choosing to have sexual relations. Women are not hypersexualized and don't need to be saved from themselves. Sex drive is tied to testosterone production. Sure, there might be a few insatiable whores with psychological issues out there, but I'd think that women are ninety nine out of a hundred times more likely to identify as ace-gray-demisexual and be into fanfiction than men. Women make better nuns than men make priests because women are better at being celibate.
Side note: A couple of times I saw some really sexist men on the Facebook forums talk about how they aren't into church girls because it's the wild women who can be tamed to embrace their 'yin nature'. This makes me think they're the male versions of those women who will go after the most simian of bad boys thinking she can reform him, only to walk away with a black eye and a fatherless child. -Only in the man's case, he'll hook up with a raunchy, bipolar flea-bitten skank thinking he's going to reform her into a fantasy housewife who will suck his dick on demand and party on the weekends, only to end up with itchy balls and eighteen years of child support because the baby is already made by the time he figures out that she isn't going to 'embrace her yin nature' (do exactly what he wants) therefore is impossible to live with. I work with two right-wing guys who fit that bill. They'll be nice to the two-dollar whores with children from several different ex-boyfriends, yet look down on me for being a bit quirky, even though I like to cook, clean, take care of children, be faithful...and all that other traditional gender role crap that men are always complaining enough women aren't into. -And that's why they are going to die alone and deserve to.
Finally, there are the dog weirdos. This is something more often found on the left, but people on the right aren't immune to it. They are the people who will identify more with animals than people and think it's an aspect of good, noble character to be able to bond with a dog because they are 'faithful animals who were bred to love you' (actually, if you were to die while they are locked in with you, they will eat your dead body before you start to smell, and if you shit yourself on the way out, they'll start there). Just yesterday, somebody posted on the Anti-SJW site on Facebook a story about a five year old girl who was bitten in the face by someones 'emotional support pitbull'. I saw several comments similar to this:
You'll see a flood of neckbeards on those posts put up pictures of their pitbulls sleeping on dog beds peacefully while talking about how great they are, and how someone wasn't watching their child well enough. I have been trolling the hell out of them. Other people have the same idea, trolling them with macros about how 'a heroic pitbull entered a burning house/swam a hundred miles to bite a child'.
To combine the two ideas together, I've seen some right-wingers put up posts about how 'men are more canine/women are more feline'. The dog people have this weird rivalry with cat-people where they think cats are literally agents of satan, so of course a woman is like a cat that is like everything bad about the world.
If that ever comes up again, I've thought of a subtle way to troll them. I'll write that if you anthropomorphize dogs and cats into MTBI personalities, then dogs would be like Extroverted Feelers, whereas cats would be Introverted Thinkers. The EF dog would be more expressive with its affections the way it will jump and slobber all over someone, whereas the IT cat might just give a chirp and a head butt on a good day, but mostly might just wink across the room. A lot of shallow, stupid idiots might interpret that as one being more capable of affection than the other. IT Cat would be more likely to think before it acted. Ever see a cat wiggle its cat butt around for like forever before it pounces? Now, EF Dog will often have impulse-control problems, like how a dog that has never bitten anybody in its life might suddenly see a ten year child bending over to tie his/her shoes as a threat and bite half his/her lip off. It will also snarf down a steaming pile of crap before something it its brain has time to fire off, "Hey...THAT'S SHIT."
Thought I'd wake this place up after a while. This resonate with anybody?