He's said that, due to the illegal immigration crisis, he would favor getting rid of birthright citizenship. Holy shit, I can think of fewer things that could be abused then a fucking test to see if you're a citizen. You're born here? Great, you're stuck with the rest of us. You have privileges and responsibilies. Denying citizenship to the children of illegals will just create an enormous class of people living here with no ties to the nation because we're not giving them any. Cut off the flow of illegals across the southwestern deserts? YES (please?) Shoot ourselves in the foot by creating an Untouchable class? One that other groups could be added to? Nope. Seal the fucking southern border with troops if need be, but we've made our bed by waiting this long and now we gotta lay in it. (Besides... Latina girls are HOT)
So, like any candidate he's got some inconsistencies. One or two I'm not sure I can get past. But, he's the only Republican with an honest, positive message (and one of two in this retarded start-a-year-early race. 'allo Obama) and it's mostly a good message. I'm wondering how his stances would hold out if he won the nomination. Whatcha think?
There is already an enormous class of people here with no ties to the rest of us. They're called illegal immigrants. They are not assimilating and they will no assimilate until we can slam the border closed, because their ghetto mentalities are constantly reinforced and expanded by the never-ending stream of people sneaking up past the border. They live in America, but they don't act like Americans. The law of large numbers and their own conduct shows that they don't belong here, because they're bringing all the trappings of their own failed civilization with them: socialist demands, poverty, and simple crime. When they don't get their way, they act the way they did back home: shit on the economy of whatever city they're infesting until they get their way.
By removing the citizenship birthright, children born to non-citizens are not automatically citizens if they happened to sprout within our borders. That will 1. reduce the incentive for expectant mothers to rush across and 2. castrate some of the more popular arguments used by removing the "think of the children" aspect of deportations. Now children get to go with their parents, and we're neither splitting families or deporting American citizens.
He's said that, due to the illegal immigration crisis, he would favor getting rid of birthright citizenship. Holy shit, I can think of fewer things that could be abused then a fucking test to see if you're a citizen. You're born here? Great, you're stuck with the rest of us. You have privileges and responsibilies. Denying citizenship to the children of illegals will just create an enormous class of people living here with no ties to the nation because we're not giving them any. Cut off the flow of illegals across the southwestern deserts? YES (please?) Shoot ourselves in the foot by creating an Untouchable class? One that other groups could be added to? Nope. Seal the fucking southern border with troops if need be, but we've made our bed by waiting this long and now we gotta lay in it. (Besides... Latina girls are HOT)
So, like any candidate he's got some inconsistencies. One or two I'm not sure I can get past. But, he's the only Republican with an honest, positive message (and one of two in this retarded start-a-year-early race. 'allo Obama) and it's mostly a good message. I'm wondering how his stances would hold out if he won the nomination. Whatcha think?
Reply
Reply
By removing the citizenship birthright, children born to non-citizens are not automatically citizens if they happened to sprout within our borders. That will 1. reduce the incentive for expectant mothers to rush across and 2. castrate some of the more popular arguments used by removing the "think of the children" aspect of deportations. Now children get to go with their parents, and we're neither splitting families or deporting American citizens.
Reply
Leave a comment