On 'Strong Female Characters'

Nov 05, 2009 01:25

I should totally be headed to bed right now, but this topic is on my mind and sort of refuses to geroff. I can only hope to dislodge it through writing ( Read more... )

rants, deep thoughts

Leave a comment

Re: obvious comment is obvious thepresidentrix November 9 2009, 20:20:52 UTC
I think the women of Dr. Who are, as a class, great examples, actually. I certainly don't mind that they're brave or that they come through in a crisis, but I appreciate that they don't all seem obviously wired to do that from birth, y'know? They have to grow into their strength the way, imo, male characters get to do more often.

Maybe it helps that they're supporting characters, and they don't have to drive the plot all alone. Because it's not that I can't think of any examples of women I identify with, it's more that I'm disturbed by this trend I see in so many stories I like. Either I think the story is great but the female characters are sadly uninteresting, or they are interesting, but they have to be extraordinary in some (often stereotypically masculine) way. It's like there's this fear that when you put a woman front and center, she can't be just anywoman, she has to be a kind of superwoman, or she doesn't merit that focus.

Of course, I'm sure there are a gabillion exceptions to what may not even be a rule. And I'm less overwrought about this, anyway, than I was the other night, LOL. But one can only hope there will come a time when we're interested enough in women to treat female characters as more routine. Make it less important for them to be unassailable.

Reply

Re: obvious comment is obvious tempestsarekind November 9 2009, 20:36:26 UTC
there's this fear that when you put a woman front and center, she can't be just anywoman, she has to be a kind of superwoman, or she doesn't merit that focus.

Oh, I totally agree! I think this happens a lot, though I'm not entirely sure *why*: I think sometimes it is a feeling that to be "interesting," a woman has to be "more like a man" (er, who let Henry Higgins in here?). And then sometimes I think it stems from worry about showing women in the "weaker" position, doing stereotypically female things that are negatively inflected. I've had this conversation with a friend, who has somewhat rigid notions of what it means to be a feminist: things like getting married, or wanting kids, or shaving your legs, are all a part of the way women are shaped by the patriarchy, rather than valid personal choices that one might make. Sometimes I think that modern storytelling media are often still stuck in that mindset. And a lot of female characters have to bear the weight of that.

So, I agree--more "assailable" female characters, please!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up