Not at the Soul Kitchen, anyway. Statistically, if 8 girls are willing to wear white shirts and pour water on themselves in front of a crowd, at least one of them should be willing to lift and/or remove said shirt. Lame
( Read more... )
Girls are not required to show their tits to anyone. Ever. For any reason.
If you think that women's bodies exist expressly for your enjoyment and you get pissed off when things don't work out that way (and refer to them as "bitches" no less), then you don't deserve to see a woman's body ever again. In fact, someone should poke out your eyes.
If you think that I think that "women's bodies exist expressly for my enjoyment," then I'm quite disappointed in your character analysis of myself, but when women get on a stage TO entertain me with their bodies, I'd like to see some body. I'm more than respectful to women, and usually when I refer to them as "bitches," it's a term of endearment, as I like girls that are a little bitchy. We aren't at war, and your defense isn't necessary.
1. I like boobs too, but I don't think I have a right to see them whenever I want. Also: what does "as a guy" mean? 2. My analysis of your character is directly related to how you present it. 3. If you think women who "entertain with their bodies" have an obligation to go further than they're willing to in order to please you, are you also the sort of person who thinks women who turn/lead you on have an obligation to have sex with or otherwise gratify you? 4. The word 'bitch' is only a term of endearment for those who buy into raunch culture and accept derogatory terms for women as the norm. 5. The word 'cunt' on the other hand...is pretty fucking rad. Look up its origins. 6. I'm at war with the world. This isn't a defense. It's an expression of disgust at the ubiquitous, thoughtless sexism of our society, which includes men who consider themselves "respectful" and nice. Reducing women to their body parts isn't justifiable, no matter how harmless you may think it is.
Comments 23
If you think that women's bodies exist expressly for your enjoyment and you get pissed off when things don't work out that way (and refer to them as "bitches" no less), then you don't deserve to see a woman's body ever again.
In fact, someone should poke out your eyes.
Pig.
Reply
If you think that I think that "women's bodies exist expressly for my enjoyment," then I'm quite disappointed in your character analysis of myself, but when women get on a stage TO entertain me with their bodies, I'd like to see some body. I'm more than respectful to women, and usually when I refer to them as "bitches," it's a term of endearment, as I like girls that are a little bitchy. We aren't at war, and your defense isn't necessary.
Cunt.
Reply
2. My analysis of your character is directly related to how you present it.
3. If you think women who "entertain with their bodies" have an obligation to go further than they're willing to in order to please you, are you also the sort of person who thinks women who turn/lead you on have an obligation to have sex with or otherwise gratify you?
4. The word 'bitch' is only a term of endearment for those who buy into raunch culture and accept derogatory terms for women as the norm.
5. The word 'cunt' on the other hand...is pretty fucking rad. Look up its origins.
6. I'm at war with the world. This isn't a defense. It's an expression of disgust at the ubiquitous, thoughtless sexism of our society, which includes men who consider themselves "respectful" and nice. Reducing women to their body parts isn't justifiable, no matter how harmless you may think it is.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment