In defence of some (DIY) pornography

[themusicgod1]

The following is rated X for "Fucking Explicit as Jeff gets. May not be suitable for small children and people with the mind of small children. Viewer discretion is advised."

Comments

She is free to her opinion

[themusicgod1]

If she didn't have her opinion then many women on the worldwide web would not have found 'the reason' whithin it why they weren't 'getting any.' It's when her opinion is treated like fact that I step in to try my best to debunk.

I am an exception. She may even be absolutely correct in the general sense(most guys are stupid assholes), but since there exists an exception to her rule then her rule must be reforumlated. That, is the scientific part. And I am certainly not alone in my being an exception, or at least thinking I am.

Sex ed actually was meant to scare us. This was the goal the whole time; 'Scare the little buggers until they are no longer afraid of authority and by then they will be out of school and by then they'll be out of our hair.' Some of our sexed teachers were aware of this and told it to us bluntly(highschool ones) others tried to hide it. It's part of being brought up in a religiously conservative area--if they didn't have to teach sex ed by law to us they wouldn't have.

Her argument requires the use of porn later on for the 'women are just cheap porn' bit. While it might be argued that watching porn is close to the real thing, watching porn 6 years ago is nothing even remotely close to the real thing.

"who find the idea of only their husbands being able to see certain of their body parts"

But this is changing. There are cameras watching us all the time, including in dressing rooms, bathrooms, and so on. This may have worked in the middle ages but it will be absolutely impossible in a not to long of a time.

As for what I want, it's obviously complex. There are a lot of variables. A vasectomy should help.