Fuckable.
I've played this game as long as I can remember being a "man." It's more intriguing now that I'm married. My standards are higher, and it's become clear that it's not solely about looks - it's about the imaginary life you've created for the subject. Would there be compatibility?
It could likely work as a "social networking" experiment. The rules are simple. On the metro - see a girl. Is she fuckable? Yes/No. At the store - see a girl. Is she fuckable? ...and, Repeat.
Today, a brunette - likely a size 6 or 8. She might've been anywhere between 18 and 23. Almost a punk look to her; dark eyeshadow, hair dyed to a near black. Low-cut bustier-type shirt; slightly "trampish" (if I may). There was something about her. That eyeshadow did wonders, but raised questions. Troubled would be an easy choice, but we're all troubled - appearances are thus null in this equation. In any regard, she definitely had a vulnerability. The answer here is obviously "Yes."
Minimum number of players: 1. Maximum: Infinite. Compare scores at the end of the day; he with the highest number of "fuckables" wins... absolutely nothing - the fun is in playing.
It could likely work as a "social networking" experiment. The rules are simple. On the metro - see a girl. Is she fuckable? Yes/No. At the store - see a girl. Is she fuckable? ...and, Repeat.
Today, a brunette - likely a size 6 or 8. She might've been anywhere between 18 and 23. Almost a punk look to her; dark eyeshadow, hair dyed to a near black. Low-cut bustier-type shirt; slightly "trampish" (if I may). There was something about her. That eyeshadow did wonders, but raised questions. Troubled would be an easy choice, but we're all troubled - appearances are thus null in this equation. In any regard, she definitely had a vulnerability. The answer here is obviously "Yes."
Minimum number of players: 1. Maximum: Infinite. Compare scores at the end of the day; he with the highest number of "fuckables" wins... absolutely nothing - the fun is in playing.