Jul 04, 2006 22:30
What constitutes a real atomic war?
I ask this because of the recent bantering back and forth between the USA and North Korea.
Is it a simple exchange of nukes, or is there a certain level of exchange that needs to be acheived?
I mean they are experimenting with one nuke. One they are trying to test.. that is it, even if they have more, it cannot be more thatn half a dozen, and they do not have a refined ability to deliver these nukes.
So I don't really see how even if North Korea was able to launch one nuke, how it could constitute an atomic war...
We dropped two of them on Japan, that was not considered an atomic war.
If one guy hit a baseball with a bat at me and about 7- 10 of my friends.. you cannnot call it a baseball game...
Kim Jong Il is just beating his chest and puffing up his fauxhawk, that is it... cause in the end, he knows that if he launched just one missle, that there will be a smouldering radioactive crater where North Korea used to be.
I just hope the nutjob in charge here can resist the challenge to show his own ass.