songsssongssongs
oh boy. i think i'ma start using this more for some reason.
yesterday was good, but i consider it bad. i know it was good though, all inspired n' stuff.
we focus on one song a day, and it seems to go different song each time we meet. interesting. and it's from me or him each. as in last time was my 'Premier II' and yesterday was chris' hard song (yet unnamed). it was worked on for a while and we discussed many ways to do it, yet we both took very different directions in our approach. i thought my way was really good, at least dinamicly, and his was strong in its force. but we needed to step back and breathe because we made like 4 parts and most of them were for like one phrase of the song. we just need to patch them together.
but i was coming home from work and thought of a really cool way or style or approach that could be considered. because he kept saying "we can consider all approaches to a song, and recreate it in many ways" or something to that degree, and i realized why don't we make the "song" like movements. using one or two riffs to combine different songs as like almost different attitudes towards something. almost nin-sih(fragile and ds) or mars volta, kinda. not as big, but have a couple songs that might be huge, put a couple of the "phrases" if you will on a cd, and then play the full versions live, or what have you. i mean, premier is already like that. i made "I" a year or so ago, but it's only really an interlude. "II" however is more 'user friendly' in the aspect that it would have vocals, and vcvc-b style in it.
now i'm thinking that grandious thing that i've been doing (but couldn't BE done because of the others) is actually going to be standard or something. it's like my passion for making the best rock ALBUMS, not just songs. ahh it's so cool. like an interlude song and then the "single" song (vcvc-b) and then and then. oh yeah, blah..dinna!
mayube more later or something. gotta talk to chris.
yesterday was good, but i consider it bad. i know it was good though, all inspired n' stuff.
we focus on one song a day, and it seems to go different song each time we meet. interesting. and it's from me or him each. as in last time was my 'Premier II' and yesterday was chris' hard song (yet unnamed). it was worked on for a while and we discussed many ways to do it, yet we both took very different directions in our approach. i thought my way was really good, at least dinamicly, and his was strong in its force. but we needed to step back and breathe because we made like 4 parts and most of them were for like one phrase of the song. we just need to patch them together.
but i was coming home from work and thought of a really cool way or style or approach that could be considered. because he kept saying "we can consider all approaches to a song, and recreate it in many ways" or something to that degree, and i realized why don't we make the "song" like movements. using one or two riffs to combine different songs as like almost different attitudes towards something. almost nin-sih(fragile and ds) or mars volta, kinda. not as big, but have a couple songs that might be huge, put a couple of the "phrases" if you will on a cd, and then play the full versions live, or what have you. i mean, premier is already like that. i made "I" a year or so ago, but it's only really an interlude. "II" however is more 'user friendly' in the aspect that it would have vocals, and vcvc-b style in it.
now i'm thinking that grandious thing that i've been doing (but couldn't BE done because of the others) is actually going to be standard or something. it's like my passion for making the best rock ALBUMS, not just songs. ahh it's so cool. like an interlude song and then the "single" song (vcvc-b) and then and then. oh yeah, blah..dinna!
mayube more later or something. gotta talk to chris.