Most of you know that I'm in a serious relationship headed towards marriage. As a wedding inches closer to reality, I'm discovering a heap of idiosyncrasies and inanities that I never, ever anticipated dealing with. Already, these include a well-meaning but slightly overbearing future mother-in-law, pushy suggestions from people I barely know about
(
Read more... )
Well, when Nate and I started talking about getting married, I wanted to know his opinion about how it was going to work. Were we just going to have a conversation about it, and decide mutually that we were engaged? Or did he want to do the whole proposal thing? I didn't really care either way, but Nate said it was important to him to ask me. So, that's why I put it the way I did--the whens and hows and wheres of engagement are something that we agreed are his territory. Does this make sense--am I answering your question?
Agreed, WillySarah--damn patriarchal society. It's unbelievably evident in this whole engagement/wedding process. Once we're married, we can kind of make it what we want to--but everyone has an opinion on what our ceremony should be like, and I'm not comfortable with a lot of the outward expressions and symbols that, to me, reflect a lot of paternalism. Don't even get me started on the potential for our parents to freak out about the possibility of us having a female officiant. I'm not even sure they'll think we're really married!
Thanks for all the kind words, Sarah. I like your writing too.
Reply
Reply
That's why it's important to me, but I'll have to ask why it's important to him.
Reply
Leave a comment