CFUW 60- sheep planning post

Aug 30, 2007 22:05

No clues? What kinda game is this?

Leave a comment

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:10:05 UTC
A HORRIBLE ONE!

Troops, we need a new strategy.

Reply

sucks_tobeme August 30 2007, 13:12:36 UTC
I think Shiouji's conversation with Kurono was pretty suspicious, but I don't know if he'd be smart enough to make a locked post with another wolf to avoid suspicion.

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:15:44 UTC
At this point, I'd be suspecting EVERYBODY not in this conversation. And I only say that last bit because... well, at this point, I either trust you guys or I don't, right? It's pretty stupid if I don't trust you now we've come this far.

So, does anyone else have a suggestion as to a new plan of attack? In general, I mean, not specific people. UNITED WE STAND!

Reply

the_kings_eyes August 30 2007, 13:18:08 UTC
...if I was gonna stick a vote up to see if I could stir up some reaction, would anyone object?

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:18:51 UTC
Hmmm... that's not a bad idea! But hold on. I think we can do better than that.

Reply

the_kings_eyes August 30 2007, 13:20:46 UTC
What do you wanna do instead?

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:24:04 UTC
Not "instead", I just want to make an improvement. Because of my conversation with Brock in that post, and the whole "no new clues" thing, the wolves are going to KNOW that we're striking out in the dark, right? So of course they won't react. Especially not just against one random vote.

Whoever sticks a vote up should provide a REASON for who they vote out. A good one! One that will sway votes! That will get the wolves more scared than a random hit, right? They're not so stupid as to be deliberately baited so easily!

Reply

sucks_tobeme August 30 2007, 13:28:42 UTC
You know who my vote for that goes on.

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:32:03 UTC
Yeah yeah! I agree that lab coat guy is totally sus. But let's not vote just yet. I wanna talk this out some more first! There's nothing to be gained from rushing straight into it... that's what we did on the first day, right? And look where it got us.

Reply

the_kings_eyes August 30 2007, 13:28:48 UTC
Well, anyone got a good reason, then? I'm reading back through old threads and coming up empty-handed.

...or we could always votepile someone, two or three votes- then it wouldn't be just one random vote.

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:35:11 UTC
Me too. We should definitely pay close attention to Kurono-kun's opened threads, since we know for sure he was a sheep, and since he was doing the most running around... he might have hit on some good stuff!

I don't think we should votepile. That will cause others to votepile. We want to get two people up for vote, and we want at least ONE of them to be a wolf. Think about it: we have one advantage here, and that's that we all trust eachother. Or, we better. There's four of us that definitely won't vote for anybody else in this group, right? There's eight people left, that means four who are not in this group. That means ONE out of those remaining four people isn't a wolf.

Reply

sucks_tobeme August 30 2007, 13:37:31 UTC
There are two wolves left. So it's two out of that four if we all trust each other.

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:41:28 UTC
... Oh yeah. Shut up, I failed maths, okay! BACK TO THE POINT.

I think we should wait and see who other people vote for, at least for now. There's not a lot to be gained from putting out our suspicions so early on, right? If we give away our suspicions and they're CORRECT, then the wolves will have PLENTY of time to come up with a counter-attack.

Also, if someone casts a vote on one of us, the likelihood of their being a wolf will rise!

Reply

sucks_tobeme August 30 2007, 13:49:23 UTC
I'd suggest that we don't jump to each others' defence to avoid suspicion, but then we're half the remaining players.

Maybe one of us should jump in that situation, and we can see who uses that as a chance to cast suspicion.

Reply

the_kings_eyes August 30 2007, 13:52:10 UTC
...that might not be a bad idea, actually.

Reply

gothrumefirst August 30 2007, 13:58:29 UTC
Yeah, but you've got to be careful that it doesn't backfire, 'cause you might end up with getting one of US ousted instead. And that would be totally lame.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up