it rarely ends
Despite taking the last couple weeks off of Twitter, I'm gearing up for an article to be linked somewhere kinda crucial, yesterday and today I popped onto the TL to grab a few shots and found this:
After The Rag got nuked from Twitter, a couple of the cyberbullies that targeted us started stalking this LJ that was connected to the Rag's TwitterFeed. Also anyone who even mentions @the_daily_rag, with the @ or not, to target them as well.
Generally the lie cyberbullies stick to is a significant warping of the truth. The Rag was accused of cyberbullying by cyberbullies because by reporting news on their abuse of others it exposed them. No kind of bully does well when exposed, and if you interfere in them abusing others they consider that to be them being attacked.
How warped is that? Claiming to be bullied by their not being permitted to freely abuse others?!
There's 2 general flaws in the content to which is in the above screenshot, and anyone who would support it. The Rag largely didn't use the @ in tweets. Kinda hard to attack anyone without mentioning them. In the past 2 months prior to suspension, The Rag only @'d anyone with tags signifying funny tweets, Follow Fridays, and 1 fun day when @SavageHawkman came back (he tweets fairly rarely).
Affiliate news accounts to The Rag that were suspended were doing much the same, not using @'s but hashtags to report news on certain cyberbullies, with added support of evidenced screenshots showing the abuse the news tweets reported on. Some were ours, like @TheNitwitNews & @BillTheCatShow, which didn't @ those they reported news on. Some were from the network of cyberbully haters we'd been building, showing them the proper way to deal with cyberbullies by not attacking them, that violence begats violence crap has gotta stop, and showing them how Twitter prefers they be dealt with.
For the most part the affiliate accounts didn't @ anyone either, unless someone specifically @'d them first... and that was conversational. Most of those were their followers, that I saw, and a few were the cyberbullies they reported news on to answer the questions they asked in a non-confrontational manner.
Anyone who views factual reporting of their attacks on others to be abuse is clearly a little fucked in the head. The Rag did news on cyberbullying in as factual a manner as possible, minus 2 minor exceptions that have nothing to do with this post.
Of course, the above screenshot clearly shows that some cyberbullies continue to stalk The Rag even when it's not on Twitter.
On a side note, the person in the screenshot above is well known to Twitter's RP Community as a cyberbully that likes to be known as Cenobite, who The Rag nicknamed the nitwit. Along with blaming those he targeted for his abuse, he trolled Twitter for others into child porn and/or getting pics of underage girls; a sick love of his. There's plenty of evidence of his illegal activity in what passes for his RP over the last few years in this blog, but let his own words show him for what he is:
More as it develops.
After The Rag got nuked from Twitter, a couple of the cyberbullies that targeted us started stalking this LJ that was connected to the Rag's TwitterFeed. Also anyone who even mentions @the_daily_rag, with the @ or not, to target them as well.
Generally the lie cyberbullies stick to is a significant warping of the truth. The Rag was accused of cyberbullying by cyberbullies because by reporting news on their abuse of others it exposed them. No kind of bully does well when exposed, and if you interfere in them abusing others they consider that to be them being attacked.
How warped is that? Claiming to be bullied by their not being permitted to freely abuse others?!
There's 2 general flaws in the content to which is in the above screenshot, and anyone who would support it. The Rag largely didn't use the @ in tweets. Kinda hard to attack anyone without mentioning them. In the past 2 months prior to suspension, The Rag only @'d anyone with tags signifying funny tweets, Follow Fridays, and 1 fun day when @SavageHawkman came back (he tweets fairly rarely).
Affiliate news accounts to The Rag that were suspended were doing much the same, not using @'s but hashtags to report news on certain cyberbullies, with added support of evidenced screenshots showing the abuse the news tweets reported on. Some were ours, like @TheNitwitNews & @BillTheCatShow, which didn't @ those they reported news on. Some were from the network of cyberbully haters we'd been building, showing them the proper way to deal with cyberbullies by not attacking them, that violence begats violence crap has gotta stop, and showing them how Twitter prefers they be dealt with.
For the most part the affiliate accounts didn't @ anyone either, unless someone specifically @'d them first... and that was conversational. Most of those were their followers, that I saw, and a few were the cyberbullies they reported news on to answer the questions they asked in a non-confrontational manner.
Anyone who views factual reporting of their attacks on others to be abuse is clearly a little fucked in the head. The Rag did news on cyberbullying in as factual a manner as possible, minus 2 minor exceptions that have nothing to do with this post.
Of course, the above screenshot clearly shows that some cyberbullies continue to stalk The Rag even when it's not on Twitter.
On a side note, the person in the screenshot above is well known to Twitter's RP Community as a cyberbully that likes to be known as Cenobite, who The Rag nicknamed the nitwit. Along with blaming those he targeted for his abuse, he trolled Twitter for others into child porn and/or getting pics of underage girls; a sick love of his. There's plenty of evidence of his illegal activity in what passes for his RP over the last few years in this blog, but let his own words show him for what he is:
More as it develops.