dude...where IS my country?
*headdesk*
who says I can't get real news from comedy central?
Dr. James Holsinger is being appointed to be the next Surgeon General. why does this make me feel like I'm taking crazy pills? Because Dr. Holsinger wrote a paper (for the United Methodist Church, I might add) on the pathophysiology of male homosexuality.
what is pathophysiology? "the study of abnormal (or diseased) physiology"
I guess female homosexuality is physiologically normal. *stares*
the pdf of his report is here. (link opens DIRECTLY to the pdf)
let me tell you, it is a real scientific gem.
It is absolutely clear that anatomically and physiologically the alimentary and reproductive systems in humans are separate organ systems.
no SHIT, sherlock. he says this, or some variation of this, 3 or 4 times in the "paper." as best I can tell, it's the thesis of the paper. I wish I was kidding.
the whole thing reads like it was being written for a high school audience...or actually, younger. undoubtedly it's because his audience was a non-scientific organization. this should make it better, but to me, it only makes it worse, because he's presenting them with drivel that could never ever be published in a medical journal.
this thing is so riddled with faulty assumptions, it's redonkulous.
*cries*
who says I can't get real news from comedy central?
Dr. James Holsinger is being appointed to be the next Surgeon General. why does this make me feel like I'm taking crazy pills? Because Dr. Holsinger wrote a paper (for the United Methodist Church, I might add) on the pathophysiology of male homosexuality.
what is pathophysiology? "the study of abnormal (or diseased) physiology"
I guess female homosexuality is physiologically normal. *stares*
the pdf of his report is here. (link opens DIRECTLY to the pdf)
let me tell you, it is a real scientific gem.
It is absolutely clear that anatomically and physiologically the alimentary and reproductive systems in humans are separate organ systems.
no SHIT, sherlock. he says this, or some variation of this, 3 or 4 times in the "paper." as best I can tell, it's the thesis of the paper. I wish I was kidding.
the whole thing reads like it was being written for a high school audience...or actually, younger. undoubtedly it's because his audience was a non-scientific organization. this should make it better, but to me, it only makes it worse, because he's presenting them with drivel that could never ever be published in a medical journal.
this thing is so riddled with faulty assumptions, it's redonkulous.
*cries*