(no subject)
Goddammit I knew I wasn't crazy!
Today Thayer talked about the spacial dimensions and the fourth spacial dimension and how it wasn't time but m^4, or rather a "hypercube." I had first come into contact with the question of dimensions in fourth grade when reading "A Wrinkle in Time" by Madeleine L'Engle; she said it was time, but I disagreed and said that it was a cube times a line, or a square squared. So thus at the time I made a preliminary sketch of the fourth dimension (which got erased when my dad erased my laptop) so it is lost, but I KNEW it looked like this:
This is the fourth spacial dimension; it is represented poorly in two dimensions. It is a cube comprising of 24 cubes radiating from the center. Every angle should be a right angle, but (like how a cube can't be drawn with all right angles in 2 dimensions), so is the hypercube unable to be constructed all with right angles in three dimensions. Each face of the larger cube should actually be divided into four squares, and other lines should be drawn in to fully show the cubes which comprise the hypercube, but they are cluttering and unnecessary. Thus, the fourth dimension is NOT time as believed but rather and logically m^4!
Now that I have you all confused I leave you to your work.