Ina May Gaskin on the beginning of the home birth movement and more.Whether you are for or against home births, there is no doubt that the competition of the home birth movement pushed hospitals to change many of their practices. Hospitals make lots of money on childbirth, money they lose in the ER. Losing those births really hurt them and forced
(
Read more... )
I'm not sure if the homebirth movement in some way convinced hospitals to change their practices, considering it makes up such a very tiny percentage of all births. But if it did, it was at the expense of babies' lives. Not worth it for a nicer room.
Just from this year, these are some of the totally preventable and sad deaths from homebirth:
http://skepticalob.blogspot.com/2011/12/homebirth-2011-deaths.html
Reply
It's about so much more than a nicer room. Would you have wanted a doc to use forceps on you before giving you a chance to push much? How about automatically cutting your perineum whether you needed it or not? Pushing you to c-section in situations that aren't warranted? Forcing you to stay in bed rather than move around? Treating you, basically, like a piece of meat? Yes it was that bad in the 60s and 70s. My mom was knocked out with gas as I was being delivered with forceps and I wasn't much over 6 lbs.
I'm not saying anything about preferences TODAY but back then, we were pushed to take control of our birthing experience by abuses in the hospitals.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Frankly, I think while there is a higher risk of mortality from birthing at home, it's probably fine for multips with low risk. But there are enough lay midwives who are willing to oversee more high risk births and the consequences aren't bad enough if something goes wrong. I think any midwife who lets a woman have a vbac at home is criminally negligent. And I worry that lay midwives aren't regulated enough, that clearly dangerous situations can be going on right under their noses and they won't force a hospital transfer.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment