In which religious fanatics airbrush that sex symbol Hillary Clinton out of a picture:
Sigh........the same Ultra-Orthodox Jewish newspaper that airbrushed Israeli *women* politicians has now done this to Hillary Clinton, claiming with a straight face that she's too sexually suggestive to accept in the photograph. I mean no disparagement to Secretary of State Clinton's political skills to note that she's well past the age where she could be considered this save to a certain few:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/08/ultra-orthodox-jewish-newspaper-photoshops-hillary-out-of-history/
Maybe it's just me and my admitted distaste for women politicians as sex symbols (face it, when Palin's what people define as attractive, the USA's no Italy), but even Sarah Palin's photos don't meet standards of sexually suggestive photographs. But this is the magazine which also refused to run photographs of Tzipi Livni in the Israeli elections last year (I imagine if Clinton and Livni are sexually suggestive, that someone like Natalie Portman or Bar Refaeli would induce heart attacks in these same people). Forgive me if I sound a bit more like the Ameriright members of the community here, but if people can't man up and get with the 21st Century and accept photographs of women on the cover of their magazines, they've no business being in marketing. Unfortunately these are also the same assclowns who hate the Israeli state, see it as an abomination.....and never hesitate to accept their monthly welfare checks from Satan's state.
The photograph, I might note, is the one mentioned in a previous thread about how Hillary was "excessively emotional." Which leads me to ask a question that's been bugging me for a while: what does Hillary Clinton do to send people in that kind of hysterical reaction about her hand being over her face? I mean she's an extremely effective Democratic politician, but it's not quite clear to me how *that* turns into the assclownery that greets a lot of her actions as Secretary of State.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/08/ultra-orthodox-jewish-newspaper-photoshops-hillary-out-of-history/
Maybe it's just me and my admitted distaste for women politicians as sex symbols (face it, when Palin's what people define as attractive, the USA's no Italy), but even Sarah Palin's photos don't meet standards of sexually suggestive photographs. But this is the magazine which also refused to run photographs of Tzipi Livni in the Israeli elections last year (I imagine if Clinton and Livni are sexually suggestive, that someone like Natalie Portman or Bar Refaeli would induce heart attacks in these same people). Forgive me if I sound a bit more like the Ameriright members of the community here, but if people can't man up and get with the 21st Century and accept photographs of women on the cover of their magazines, they've no business being in marketing. Unfortunately these are also the same assclowns who hate the Israeli state, see it as an abomination.....and never hesitate to accept their monthly welfare checks from Satan's state.
The photograph, I might note, is the one mentioned in a previous thread about how Hillary was "excessively emotional." Which leads me to ask a question that's been bugging me for a while: what does Hillary Clinton do to send people in that kind of hysterical reaction about her hand being over her face? I mean she's an extremely effective Democratic politician, but it's not quite clear to me how *that* turns into the assclownery that greets a lot of her actions as Secretary of State.