Leave a comment

rasilio February 23 2011, 22:45:30 UTC
Now if only these graphs actually proved anything ( ... )

Reply

geezer_also February 24 2011, 03:21:12 UTC
Welcome to telemann's statistics :D

Reply

politikitty February 24 2011, 05:29:28 UTC
So what you mean to say is that while public unions might be bad for the economy at a later date, it has nothing to do with the current financial crisis. What an incredibly off-topic point. But one I'll entertain anyway.

Only unions get pensions?

Indiana, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas and Kentucky are all among the top ten states that are projected to run out of their pensions. (source) All have around 25% or less public union participation.

New York, with over 75% public union participation was one of five states estimated to not run out within the next 25 years.

Reply

whoasksfinds February 24 2011, 05:50:16 UTC
we know we'll have to make cuts eventually, but lets just keep delaying those cuts as long as possible. yep, sounds like a short sighted career politician to me.

Reply

politikitty February 24 2011, 05:56:30 UTC
I didn't say that pensions weren't a problem. But pensions are a problem with or without unions.

Reply

whoasksfinds February 24 2011, 05:58:26 UTC
publicly funded, defined benefit pensions are a problem, yes.

Reply

politikitty February 24 2011, 06:03:28 UTC
Which exist independent of unions.

Reply

whoasksfinds February 24 2011, 06:05:55 UTC
and unions will still exist after the democrats come out of hiding and the bill passes in wisconsin.

Reply

anfalicious February 24 2011, 09:35:50 UTC
but if they lose the right to collectively bargain, then they're kind of pointless.

Reply

whoasksfinds February 24 2011, 14:29:22 UTC
1) this has nothing to do with private sector unions
2) they will still have collective bargaining rights for their salary

Reply

anfalicious February 25 2011, 02:58:56 UTC
I thought this stuff going on in Wisconsin was public sector unions fighting a move to remove collective bargaining rights?

Reply

whoasksfinds February 25 2011, 04:17:11 UTC
when the bill passes, the teachers union will have collective bargaining rights, but only in regards to their salary, not their pensions.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

whoasksfinds February 25 2011, 17:19:36 UTC
increases are limited to the CPI, unless voters approve otherwise.

Reply

anfalicious February 24 2011, 09:35:11 UTC
then it's a pity that politicians have been offering this in lieu of paying proper salaries for decades isn't it.

Reply

whoasksfinds February 24 2011, 14:27:54 UTC
that it is.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up