Leave a comment

underlankers March 16 2016, 18:36:27 UTC
WorldNetDaily writes articles like this entirely seriously:

http://www.wnd.com/2007/03/40476/

"People have been coming back from the dead by the hundreds during the past 15-20 years. All over the world, stone-cold-dead people are being resurrected by the fervent, focused prayers of Christians praying in the name of Jesus.

By now, the totals are likely over a thousand. No exaggeration, no joke. My own book “Megashift: Igniting Spiritual Power” documents 52 countries where at least one person has been raised from the dead - with named eyewitnesses … who have street addresses … and phone numbers … and fax numbers … and e-mail addresses. I even throw in a few photographs. In other words, my little shoestring-budget book clobbers the nonexistent scholarship of James (“Titanic”) Cameron. What he doesn’t know about resurrections could fill a book - and it does: mine!

So now that Cameron has been trashed by, umm, pretty much everybody who ever got past the eighth grade and has access to a computer, it’s time to state a monumental fact that even our better-informed intelligentsia have failed to notice"

That in and of itself makes it basically a Weekly World News written by people who actually BELIEVE shit like this and Chemtrails kill angels.

Sun Myung Moon http://www.perkel.com/politics/moonies/ <-bankrolls a scary amount of the Religious Right.

Citing these two in critiquing Islamist fanatics is like taking the opinion of hyenas on the predatory methods of lions.

The other sources like Reuters and the Beeb are infinitely better because they have standards and don't sincerely believe "Booga Booga Jesus sez so" is all it takes to reanimate a corpse!

Reply

mahnmut March 16 2016, 18:48:54 UTC
Well, sorry for not meeting your expectations in terms of source reliability.

So do you have a list of sources that you consider reliable or not?

Reply

underlankers March 16 2016, 18:52:59 UTC
I already told you, Reuters, the BBC, the Huffington Post. Any site that has actual editing standards and doesn't employ fascist nutjobs like Michael Savage.

Reuters
BBC
Der Spiegel
Al Jazeera English
CBS
MSNBC
Associated Press

^All of these are better than WND

Reply

mahnmut March 16 2016, 19:21:20 UTC
I'll keep that in mind the next time I search for links. Can't afford to let underlankers down, can I.

Reply

underlankers March 16 2016, 19:30:08 UTC
So, about the rest of that comment, the bit that said that this is a deplorable pattern that ultimately meant the people who warned these people were dangerous that were right. There will eventually be some reference to the rest of that post, and to my attempts to keep the topic specifically to denouncing the kind of conduct the Islamists (and Erdogan) have relative to democracy, yes? Maybe?

Reply

mahnmut March 16 2016, 19:32:17 UTC
Yes: Kudos.

Reply

mahnmut March 17 2016, 20:50:12 UTC
Same question here, by the way.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up