Like I've said each time in those two hundred occasions when you've brought this up before, if you're willing to hold yourself to the Russian moral standards, be my guest.
Not at all, I'm asking why anti-war movements only manifest at specific times since opposing war is something that really should be consistent. If you're opposed to very bad things done by soldiers to civilians, as most people should be, then why is it that these very bad things only matter with a specific subset of US politicians? Likewise, if people really care about the refugee crisis treating the people who are deliberately boosting it as allies is a damn fool mistake.
Because I'm curious as to what others think, and because I haven't actually made up my mind on anything other than refusing to treat Russia as a causal agent in the refugee crisis being a moronic concept.
Somehow I doubt your intention is inquiry rather than assertion. Certainly didn't seem that way from your phrasing in the OP, which was full of rhetorical questions. But nevermind.
Nice job of poisoning a well and skipping out on a discussion because you're either incapable of answering the questions or simply unwilling to do so. If simply saying "I can read your mind and know what you're actually thinking" is all it takes to discuss things here now, that'll make things easier. I can just go into any thread and say "But that's not what you're really asking, is it?"
And leave it at that and then skip out on a discussion. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Doubt is a cheap way to dodge a question and claim a high ground, after all.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And leave it at that and then skip out on a discussion. :)
Reply
This is going nowhere. I'm out.
Reply
Leave a comment