Dread Scott in action
FL DEP Employee Suspended and Forced to Obtain Medical Release for Mentioning Climate Change
So much with the sacred Freeeedoooom of Speech, eh?
First off, here's a stupid question. So if a state employee in FL replies to an email containing the phrase "climate change", do they have to edit the reply text or what? Does the IT head have to edit the words in their email archive? Someone explain this to me please, for I am confus'd.
As for King Scott the Great, I say great job, King Scott! I'm sure he must merely be practicing how he would run the rest of the country if he becomes king, oh wait I mean POTUS... Mind you, these are the same right-wingers that call president Obama a dictator or king (or an apologetic sissy, depending on the circumstances).
What I'm at a loss abut is how can the voters in that state, or any other state, keep voting for these completely phony slimeballs who would pull the switch on anyone who doesn't donate millions to their campaigns, and who'd shit on the very same things (freedom of speech including) that they keep shoving into the public's faces over and over again.
You know, I used to get mad at right-wing scum like this guy who say off the wall shit on a daily basis - but now I just smirk at the people who voted for them. And laugh even harder at the people who didn't get out an vote, but then went on to rant about the "current state of affairs". Yeah, you heard me. The people who don't vote are responsible for these disgusting, despicable, disgraceful cowards who inhabit the Party of Scrooge, weaned on the Cock (sic) brothers, who in a normal country would be deemed fringe wackos with no place in real politics, and should probably even serve time for their corruption-inspired perversion of democracy.
On a side note, and using the same or a similar logic, if we're to go on a banning spree about things that are considered "not true fact", then shouldn't the Bible and all things related to it also go down, eh? Or this thing ain't quite like that other thing, too?
So much with the sacred Freeeedoooom of Speech, eh?
First off, here's a stupid question. So if a state employee in FL replies to an email containing the phrase "climate change", do they have to edit the reply text or what? Does the IT head have to edit the words in their email archive? Someone explain this to me please, for I am confus'd.
As for King Scott the Great, I say great job, King Scott! I'm sure he must merely be practicing how he would run the rest of the country if he becomes king, oh wait I mean POTUS... Mind you, these are the same right-wingers that call president Obama a dictator or king (or an apologetic sissy, depending on the circumstances).
What I'm at a loss abut is how can the voters in that state, or any other state, keep voting for these completely phony slimeballs who would pull the switch on anyone who doesn't donate millions to their campaigns, and who'd shit on the very same things (freedom of speech including) that they keep shoving into the public's faces over and over again.
You know, I used to get mad at right-wing scum like this guy who say off the wall shit on a daily basis - but now I just smirk at the people who voted for them. And laugh even harder at the people who didn't get out an vote, but then went on to rant about the "current state of affairs". Yeah, you heard me. The people who don't vote are responsible for these disgusting, despicable, disgraceful cowards who inhabit the Party of Scrooge, weaned on the Cock (sic) brothers, who in a normal country would be deemed fringe wackos with no place in real politics, and should probably even serve time for their corruption-inspired perversion of democracy.
On a side note, and using the same or a similar logic, if we're to go on a banning spree about things that are considered "not true fact", then shouldn't the Bible and all things related to it also go down, eh? Or this thing ain't quite like that other thing, too?