The Eurozone crisis, Is there a way out?

Jul 25, 2013 16:15

I was just reading now on LA times (McManus: Europe's continental drift), and a phrase really captured my attention; The author, while describing how bad the situation is in Europe (especially the southern countries) goes as far as saying:

"
Southern Europe is experiencing its worst drop in living standards since World War IITo anyone who has been ( Read more... )

economy, debt, italy, crisis

Leave a comment

meus_ovatio July 25 2013, 13:05:52 UTC
There is a surefire way out of these problems.

Tell the banks and creditors that they lost out on bad bets and bad investments. Cancel the debt. Withdraw from the euro. Re-nationalize the currency and the central banks for those countries.

This is the only way out of the mess. But it won't happen because:

A)It makes sense, and the technorati refuse to do anything that makes sense, ever, at all, not even once,
B)Too many very powerful people stand lose a lot of money, and they are more important than an entire generation of Europeans lives and livelihoods.
C)People inherently believe that slavery is ok, and enslaving an entire populace into paying off bad debt taken on by foolish banks is morally honorable.

Reply

farmerz_agent July 25 2013, 13:32:17 UTC
If we re-nationalize their currency and start over why would these countries not just continue to over spend?

C) Who is responsible for this debt, the people and governments they elected right? Is it morally honorable to borrow money and spend then blame the people you borrowed the money from? Did the Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and Portuguese really think they could spend and spend without consequences?

Eventually you run out of other people's money.

Reply

meus_ovatio July 25 2013, 13:40:28 UTC
If we re-nationalize their currency and start over why would these countries not just continue to over spend?
The problem isn't that they were overspending. The problem is that they gave up sovereignty to their economies and currencies. They would've been fine. They would've dealt with thing as needed. Quit turning everything into some simplistic pabulum about a morality tale. It just isn't reality.

C) Who is responsible for this debt, the people and governments they elected right?
No, those who take the risks are responsible for it. There is no moral guarantee in lending money. If you lend money and they don't pay it back, tough, that's business. You take that risk. It's called risk in the first place, for a reason. If the financial overlords want guaranteed returns, then they don't get any interest. Them's the rules.

Did the Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and Portuguese really think they could spend and spend without consequences?
No, they didn't think that at all. Do you really think that they thought this? Are you insane?

... )

Reply

liveco July 25 2013, 13:50:32 UTC
The problem isn't that they were overspending. The problem is that they gave up sovereignty to their economies and currencies. They would've been fine. They would've dealt with thing as needed.

Let me take an example out of the four countries we are discussing. Greece, are you aware of the level of corruption in Greece? The Greek economy has been struggling way before it joined the Eurozone. Joining the eurozone did harm the Greek economy, not because it lost its sovereignty but because the Greek exports became more expensive and less competitive in the international markets after year 2001 and because Greek Tourism was harmed by the expensive euro vs the old drachma

Reply

farmerz_agent July 25 2013, 14:04:24 UTC
You want them to abandon the Euro and go back to individual countries currencies? Is that the Genesis of the problem with these European countries they gave up their sovereignty. That makes sense Detroit can't print money or it wouldn't be filing for bankruptcy

If you lend money and they don't pay it back, tough, that's business.
No, your assets can be repossessed, your wages garnished, leans and levies can be laced on your property. Borrowing money is a risk on both parties. Are you saying that the loans giving to these countries are 100% unsecured loans? I didn't know that was how the money was lent to countries. If so, how will that effect their future credit rating? Would any 'sane' financial institution lend them money again? Countries need credit in order to function don't they?

Quit turning everything into some simplistic pabulum about a morality tale. It just isn't reality.
I don't think I'm doing this. Also I don't understand 'pabulum' (comestible: any substance that can be used as food?)

Reply

peristaltor July 25 2013, 20:40:36 UTC
You want them to abandon the Euro and go back to individual countries currencies?I'll try to explain things in a nutshell. First, in a truly sovereign nation, the money supply can be controlled through taxation and regulation. In a growing economy, the number of [insert currency name here]s increases slowly; the larger the amount, the less each individual [insert currency name here] is worth ( ... )

Reply

peamasii July 25 2013, 15:02:27 UTC
Do those things and you'll end up with pre-EU europe, when the growth rate was way behind the UK and the US. No way in hell that France or Germany would want/allow that to happen. As shrinking as the peripheral EU economies are, they are still far more valuable as part of the EU than not.

Reply

meus_ovatio July 26 2013, 01:38:49 UTC
Oh noes. Look at what you got now. It's terrible. You're not avoiding anything.

Reply

peamasii July 26 2013, 12:49:23 UTC
That would mean for southern europe to return to the poor, downscaled, rural, non-industrialized, agrarian economies that they used to be pre-WWII. Let's just be clear about this before arguing what is best and for who.

Reply

meus_ovatio July 26 2013, 13:06:24 UTC
As opposed to being enslaved for a generation to pay off draconian debt?

Reply

peamasii July 26 2013, 13:16:55 UTC
As opposed to being part of the largest economic zone in the world. Little isolationist nations with no future, even their largest export which is tourism will die out because of lack of conditions and services. No one will lend them money and no one will develop or produce anything on their territories. Until some expansionist nation like Turkey comes along and...

Reply

meus_ovatio July 26 2013, 16:45:01 UTC
Yes, having your own currency makes you "isolationist". That makes total sense.

Reply

peristaltor July 25 2013, 20:26:13 UTC
This.

Reply

pastorlenny July 25 2013, 20:50:50 UTC
The fact that you would even think about prioritizing the well-being of shiftless youth above the moral integrity of capital allocation only underscores how certainly the experiment we call "Western Civilization" is doomed to failure. The future clearly belongs to the Overman.

Reply

meus_ovatio July 26 2013, 02:50:14 UTC
I earnestly pray every day for the failure of Western civilization.

Reply

pastorlenny July 26 2013, 03:05:47 UTC
WHY DO YOU HATE JESUS???

Reply


Leave a comment

Up