A hypothetical...
...Inspired by a question from Kylinrouge in this thread.
Let us suppose for a moment that proponents of Critical Race Theory are correct and that true objectivity is impossible. That any claims of rationality, objective truth, and judicial neutrality are in fact simply effeorts by those in power to hold onto thier power, as a result Blacks and other minorities are at a distinct disadvantage because the fabric of society itself is rigged against them.
Let us also suppose that there was a procedure, pill, or device, that could quickly and cheaply and permenantly alter someone's Race, Religion, or Sexual Orientation.
Would it be ethical to use such a device?
In what way would prescribing a "treatment" for somone's race or religion differ from prescribing treatment for any other physical or mental malady such as impared-vision or depression?
I haven't been able to come up with a good answer.
Let us suppose for a moment that proponents of Critical Race Theory are correct and that true objectivity is impossible. That any claims of rationality, objective truth, and judicial neutrality are in fact simply effeorts by those in power to hold onto thier power, as a result Blacks and other minorities are at a distinct disadvantage because the fabric of society itself is rigged against them.
Let us also suppose that there was a procedure, pill, or device, that could quickly and cheaply and permenantly alter someone's Race, Religion, or Sexual Orientation.
Would it be ethical to use such a device?
In what way would prescribing a "treatment" for somone's race or religion differ from prescribing treatment for any other physical or mental malady such as impared-vision or depression?
I haven't been able to come up with a good answer.