There's also the issue that the media has jumped on this while they couldn't be bothered with John Edwards and his extra-curricular activities, or the general lack of seriousness the left/media took with Clinton's indiscretions. -- Yep. Even when it came out that Edwards had used campaign funds to cover up his affair and his love child, people barely batted an eye and chalked it up to 'politics as usual'. Now with Herman Cain, there's unsubstantiated allegations and they immediately cry 'pervert'. Really
( ... )
I'm sorry if this bothers you or anyone else, but I'm not going to allow someone else to answer for me when I can speak for myself. I believe something was asked of BOTH of us, and I shouldn't be the only one that has to comply.
I think you're the kind of person who'd tiptoe on the line of acceptable jabbing and try to lure whoever has been on your target, and wouldn't be too shy of using all sorts of mean tactics to exploit their weak spots to knock them off balance until they lose their nerve and let the steam off. Then you'd sit back and play innocent, and enjoy the sight. You think people are too stupid to not notice this?
When you complain about people addressing you, you should've first considered WHY they're doing it. When you speak on behalf of a third person the way you did, and then demand that they don't respond to that, this is very disingenuous and unfair. I thought you should know.
Where did you hear that Bialek filed a complaint? The way the media is reporting it, she never spoke of the allegations until recently. Her own S.O. didn't even know until the day she was leaving to go to NYC for her press conference.
I don't have any opinion on the women involved one way or another. The issue is the allegations and considering there's no evidence to back any of it up, it's questionable.
Yep. Even when it came out that Edwards had used campaign funds to cover up his affair and his love child, people barely batted an eye and chalked it up to 'politics as usual'.
"On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges related to an extramarital affair he admitted to following his 2008 campaign. If convicted, Edwards faces up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Two of them even received settlements for it.
Now, does that change your opinion about them?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't have any opinion on the women involved one way or another. The issue is the allegations and considering there's no evidence to back any of it up, it's questionable.
Reply
"On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges related to an extramarital affair he admitted to following his 2008 campaign. If convicted, Edwards faces up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
Yeah, nothing happened!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment