Kenneth Feingold was on the radio this morning and was discussing his role in several mass settlement deals where victims of various events attempted to receive compensation through large funds set aside for that purpose. Honestly, Feingold is one of those people who are so easy to dislike; but he executed his responsibilities with a certain level
(
Read more... )
Reply
I think you have missed the point of the question. I am not questioning that the responders and those who were employed or volunteered as responders should be properly compensated. I am suggesting that the with regards to the victims that the legal and moral fault is being placed on the wrong shoulders - and that it has been done because the real perpetrators are unapproachable and we, as a society, are litigious and feel that someone HAS to be held accountable - and why not the ones with the deepest pockets. I am asking why the airlines, the building management, etc. are the responsible parties and why they are the ones that required legal protection by way of this fund established by Congress.
Reply
Ah. If that's what you were saying then yes, I agree with what you said. I think where the fault would have laid were this to actually be legally charted would be with both the Clinton and Bush leaders of the CIA and other intelligence agencies who after the first terrorist attack on the Twin Towers did not realize when a second one aimed at them and the Pentagon and at least one other place was in the offing in sufficient time to nip it in the bud.
Reply
How do you nip a plane flying into a building in the bud?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Put a lot of pics!
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment