In
the last post I made on this forum, I pointed out a recent hardware hack to electronic voting machines here in the United States. As usual, people pointed out that this was an anomaly, that this could not happen in the Real World™, that it is just as important as Acorn (that one stumped me), et cetera ad infinitum ad naseumI say "as usual"
(
Read more... )
Yup. That's all it took. Next. A lot of coulda, shoulda, woulda. But not the actual occurence and evidence for your claims. all conjecture and conspiracy theory and no real evidence.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Uh oh. We agreed on something. I feel Armageddon coming.
Reply
Reply
Reply
That would be the logic behind the birthers, truthers, etc.
Reply
So moving on, if there is ample evidence that something was not right, investigation makes sense, doesn't it?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The first is that if there are irregularities, investigation is valid however people need to separate "something needs investigated" and "Those guys are committing fraud!!!11" I think that was the point the OP was making, and I agree with it.
The second though is that we shouldn't not investigate just because it is sometimes used as an excuse to accuse people a la first point. if we can keep investigation and accusation separate, we're all a lot better off.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment