Leave a comment

james_the_evil1 December 6 2012, 04:25:34 UTC
I think you dance around a point that has a lot to do with it, and that's selfishness. If you really truly believe the world will end in your lifetime, or shortly after, then global warming doesn't matter, pollution doesn't matter, providing education or social security for the next generation doesn't matter, etc. So that means all the resources & sacrifices required for those things are no longer needed and we can continue to live carelessly & as we please without having to care or think about it.
That's certainly common on the political right in the US, and the apocalyptic beliefs of their religious members dovetail with the outright greedy members who just don't care about a future as long as they get theirs now.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

chaos5023 December 6 2012, 16:43:57 UTC
Is that what wingnuts think of Keynesian spending -- that borrowing at the bottom of the business cycle and paying down debt at the top, in a fashion that's empirically demonstrated to work, is somehow the same as Republican Party Secretary of the Interior James Watt saying "I do not know how many future generations we can count on before the Lord returns".

Thanks, good to know!

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

chaos5023 December 7 2012, 03:53:51 UTC
Uh huh. I guess it must have been a left-wing president who decided that the thing to do with a budget surplus was a massive welfare program for the super-rich, then, right?

Reply

james_the_evil1 December 6 2012, 16:57:50 UTC
It happens on both sides, yes. But it's not a basic steering principle on the left in the US.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up