settle an argument

Jul 30, 2008 17:43

(These little settle-an-argument polls are not necessarily for Dreamwidth, by the way -- just, well, to settle an argument. *g* In this case, though, we're deciding between "rip out Snapshot functionality entirely" and "change Snapshots to being a logged-in-user viewing preference only and never let someone force you to see them if you don't want ( Read more... )

stupid poll tricks

Leave a comment

trobadora July 30 2008, 21:55:43 UTC
My immediate response is "rip it out, burn it, and dance on its ashes." Which, uh, might be a tad excessive. *g*

Reply

synecdochic July 30 2008, 22:00:44 UTC
That was mine, too. And Mark's. But on second thought ... I kinda hate the thought of just ripping them out entirely, in case they're someone else's "best thing since sliced bread", so my current way of thinking is, change it to a user-based viewing pref defaulted to fucking off that will allow people to enable them only for their account while logged in, if they want.

It's kind of six-of-one in terms of effort required, I think, but I still wanted to see if my gut instinct (that very few, but some people find them interesting/useful) was correct.

Reply

florahart July 30 2008, 22:03:12 UTC
"defaulted to fucking off" is a standard to be applied at about 90% of all opportunities, and hard to go wrong with, IMO.

Reply

cofax7 July 30 2008, 22:15:34 UTC
Wordy McWord. With sprinkles on top.

Reply

druidspell July 30 2008, 22:26:56 UTC
Wordy McWordington, compadre. ESPECIALLY when it comes to the fucking Snap previews!

Reply

eregyrn July 30 2008, 23:01:56 UTC
SO. TRUE.

In relation to SnapShots (I didn't even know what they were called until now), all I have to say is, if they were actually *called* what they *are*, "SPOILER-VIEW", then I bet even more people would feel negatively about them than already do.

Reply

trobadora July 30 2008, 22:05:02 UTC
Oh look, what's that? You're being all reasonable, that's not fair! *pouts*

(In all seriousness - yeah, there's no harm in it if you don't have to see it, or figure out how to block it yourself. I'm just kinda burned with things you "don't have to see if you don't want to!", because most of the time there are loopholes, and you end up seeing the friggin' stuff anyway.)

Reply

malnpudl July 30 2008, 23:33:23 UTC
Oh, no! Not excessive at all!

Reply

pauamma July 31 2008, 00:09:17 UTC
It is a tad excessive. On the side of excessive niceness, that is.

Reply

dear_sweet_lana August 2 2008, 08:22:57 UTC
Not excessive at all! I'd say you're being quite restrained and cool-headed!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up