Dec 27, 2004 10:49
Hm, I enjoyed seeing everyone's thoughts about my last post. So much, in fact, that I've decided to weigh the other side of the argument. Although it's not really an argument at all, but more of a speculation.
Now, being female, you might assume that I am biased in favor of my own gender. But like that which separates the men from the boys (or digress even to just males), the female species is also divided against itself. In fact, I believe we have atleast THREE categories to consider: The Ladies, The Girls, and the Bitches.
The typical female can be very stupid too, but the majority are cunning, manipulative, and like Kareem emphasized earlier, are capable of very raw and intentional emotional damage to both genders alike. This is a much worse characteristic than that of our male partners. Their weapon of choice is usually of psychological impact or emotional distress. These females toy with men's minds to achieve their own desires, and are also capable of doing so by physical means. Seduction is a big one, and it is pretty obvious in history and literature. I remember researching Lady Macbeth, a mild case in literature, mind you, and wanting to kill myself. In a large way, she contributed to her husband's tragedy, but that's going too far into AP Lit, so I'll shut up now. :)
The Ladies are refined women who control their manipulative nature to the best of their ability. This means modesty, this means self-control and poise. This means wisdom enough to know when and when not to interfere. There is no perfect lady of course, but she is considerate enough not to abuse any power she has. What separates the ladies from the girls is generally lack of knowledge or experience on the girls' part. The bitches, however, are a totally different story. Let me give you a scenario.
There was a time that I've witnessed two females engaging in combat over a male. One female attacked another, first with harsh words as they swayed their heads at one another like derranged turkeys. They circled eachother like sparring roosters, ruffling their plumage and sticking out their necks and their butts like it was some kind of spectacle. Then they commenced their ritual hair-pulling, face-clawing, and shoe-tossing. I could only look at them in disgust. I considered joining the fight and knocking them both flat on their pretty faces, but wanted to avoid any association with them. Atleast male combat is fairly more interesting, you know. Use a damn fist or something. God forbid you break a nail. But anyway. This situation could have been handled in one of three ways:
Were the attacker a lady, she might have confronted the other female calmly, if her anger was really that intense over a dumb male in the first place. A genuine man would not sleep with another woman simply for the pleasure of irritating both females. That's something a dumb male would do. So she was obviously NOT a lady because of 1) Her approach to the situation, 2) Her intimate relationship with a dumb male, and 3) Her lack of modesty and self-control.
Were the attacker a girl, she would have definitely been immature about it. Every girl wants her boy, naturally. Every girl is going to be selfish more often than not, and is not entirely capable of controlling her manipulative impulses. She's naive and unstable, and emotionally distraught at times. However, she does have her limits. She knows when to back off. She intentionally oversteps the boundaries to see how far she can go, but when confrontation presents itself, she backs down or takes the brunt of her actions. Daddy taught her to atleast deal with the consequences. However, we know the attacker was not a girl, because of 1) her attempt to avoid the consequence of intitiating the fight, and 2) her failure to stop overstepping her boundaries.
We know now, that the attacker was indeed, a bitch. Why? She manipulated a poor stupid male to engage in sexual realtions with her (of all people), she failed to control herself upon discovering that this stupid male left her for another female body, she failed to remember that she was dating a stupid male who was going to leave her for another bitch anyway, she failed to maintain her public modesty (if she had any to begin with), and she miscalculated the consequences of initiating combat with another bitch. She blameshifted when she knew very well that this was all entirely her own fault. Her behaviour manifested the very essense of stupid bitch. She was irrational, confrontational, power-hungry, reckless, and gluttonous. She was a whore too, not to mention, but that's under the bitch category. I could really go on and on about why this female was a bitch, but I think you've got the picture. And that was just one example.
So men, take care in selecting your lady. Should you choose to be a typical male instead, you can have all the whore sex you want and still be a senseless male, which I suppose is just fine for some.
But ladies, when you engage in battle for your sexual dignity, do yourself a favor and don't throw your shoes at your nemesis. You have to walk away from the fight somehow, and your shoe will probably not harm her in the slightest. Unless, of course, you're wearing stillettos and you played little league for 8 years.