(Untitled)

Jun 07, 2007 16:47

Also!
Because I refuse to believe that anyone, even in the context of Big brother eight, could be dumb enough, to call someone the N-word on said show, especially after the furore over celebrity BB ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

(The comment has been removed)

magic_treehouse June 8 2007, 08:13:17 UTC
The thing about new rave is that there isn't any rave in there. See also - CSS. It's just NME scrapping the barrel, desparate for a new 'scene'. Twats.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

magic_treehouse June 8 2007, 08:33:14 UTC
They're on my list of bands to try out. I don't really care about hype, if I like them I like them and they sound like they may be my cup of tea :D

Reply

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:12:00 UTC
However - don't they sound quite a bit like what the sleepy jackson did on their last album? And yet that got released to no fanfair whatsoever.....

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:22:02 UTC
It was a lot like the best album of 2006 as it happens. Download the track 'you needed more' and you'll see what I mean.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:26:46 UTC
What crazy world do you live in where i don't have the new elliott smith album? I may be poor, but I have priorities.
I'll take a copy of emily haines though. I'll have to find out if this computer has a cd writer but I shall assume it does and say yes.

Reply

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:09:40 UTC
Hang aboot now - Klaxons coined the term new rave. They later said, in an interview with the guardian, that they were just trying to get attention and were embarrassed by the way the nme leapt on it. But they are, therefore, new rave.

But who else is? They're the only people I've seen get called it, although people at college count calvin harris and hadouken (sp? I have no idea who/what this band is) as forerunners.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:23:40 UTC
I saw that! Heh heh. Is it just me though or does she look a lot thinner in profile than she does from the front? Has she been airbrushed?

Some people at college recently went to a fancy dress party as 'ravers'. Bear in mind that they would have been about 4 at the peak of actual rave music. And their costumes involved 'save the rave' t shirts and flourescent sunglasses, to match their emo hairdos. You'd have shat on them.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

sweet_blindness June 8 2007, 14:28:25 UTC
Not digusting as such, just a bit gimmicky and gratuitous. I get it, you're fat. I would have noticed without her having to undress.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


Leave a comment

Up