(no subject)
this afternoon when i was sitting around waiting for my bananna muffins to finnish baking i was reading Macleans magazine. It was a really good issue this month. The cover story was on the DaVinci Code. I was happy to see it cause i really liked the book, but then i actually read it and was horrably dissapointed. The story on it was terribly written as well as being a bad review. It complained of the code being poorly written and badly reasearched, but there is no way it was worse then the article itself. it does this whole the code versus history that dont even diprove or necisarily make a relevent comment on what tey are critisizing. in fact its quite humerous how unrelated there "facts" are.
Although the other articles were quite good especialyy the one on RUFUS WAINWRIGHT! i nearly peed myself when i saw it cause i didn't realize this was the issue with him in it. He was adorable as always!
A la rufus "I once stol a pencil sharpner. I was dating a junkie at the time who stole vats of Haagen-dazs ice cream, so i wanted to be cool to"
How can you all not love him?
Although the other articles were quite good especialyy the one on RUFUS WAINWRIGHT! i nearly peed myself when i saw it cause i didn't realize this was the issue with him in it. He was adorable as always!
A la rufus "I once stol a pencil sharpner. I was dating a junkie at the time who stole vats of Haagen-dazs ice cream, so i wanted to be cool to"
How can you all not love him?