i must say i am rather offended by that picture... comparing this dumbass texan to a great leader... i mean really!!! have you kids no respect for the dead... Hitler was a great leader, he had the smartest nation of his time following him in whatever he said... now i don't support what he did in anyway... but i still think it is literally amazing what he was able to do... i mean the smartest nation followed him in killing millions... who today would have that power!? NO BODY!!!!! as for bush... vote for him the killer of foreigns or vote for kerry the one who think killing babies is ok or better yet toss your vote away and give it to nader... "a choice between shit is still shit"~ anti-flag
umm this little voice inside me says that murder is wrong... i think they might call that sanity being someone who is insane does not know the difference between right and wrong... then again i don't always know either but this time i do... woo hoo
personally, i don't think aortions are really taking lives, because the baby has yet to really live. However, I don't think it should be used as a form of birth control. "LOL LETS NOT USE A CONDOM" "IM ON MIE RAG SHO I WONT HAVE BABY" "OHNOZ PREGGO" yeah....
Uh, what if the condom breaks? What if the girl is a rape victim? What if they got caught in the "heat of the moment"? What if the birth control didn't work?
It's an easy mistake to make... you shouldn't have to SUFFER for it. It's not exactly like you're slaying someone.
Personally, if I'd get pregnant and wouldn't want the baby and wouldn't be able to get an abortion, I'd try and punch and hurt my stomach as much as possible to try and "kill" whatever is in there, and risk dying 'cause of it. Maybe that's just me? Personally, I reckon that the baby could hardly be called "alive" in the first months, since technically it's a parasite feeding on us.
I think we should have the right to choose. Some people can't afford babies, or may not have the time for them, or will practically just give the baby a SHITTY LIFE, and personally I don't think we should inflict this upon some people and their technically-not-yet-existent-children.
And yes.. I know that there is abortion, but adopting someone isn't cheap either.
Besides, everytime you have an abortion the risk gets bigger that you won't be able to get pregnant again. So I hardly think people would use it as birth control, unless they're really stupid.
Well, uh, do you eat eggs? Because those eggs could of became "alive" just as much as our "embryos" could.
Personally, I see our "embryos" as property. Either we keep it, or get rid of it. Technically it isn't alive yet, which means it isn't really murder to get rid of it. It's PREVENTING it from BECOMING alive.
Murder isn't always wrong, you ought to define what you're arguing for a bit better.
Personally I think you're the insane one, you've obviously not been put into this situation in your life, and probably never will.
The right and wrong in this argument depends on the conditions. It practically depends on the girl who got pregnant, and the person who got her pregnant.
If the girl is homeless then it's practically WRONG not to let her have an abortion, since who knows, maybe she won't make it to a hospital and will give birth in the street and she will bleed to death? I mean. THINK OF THE BABY AS WELL, NOT JUST THE POOR FUCKER WHO GOT PREGNANT. You seem to be pretty narrow-minded about this.
Reply
i'm not saying bush is smarter then hitler.
Reply
Reply
Reply
"LOL LETS NOT USE A CONDOM"
"IM ON MIE RAG SHO I WONT HAVE BABY"
"OHNOZ PREGGO"
yeah....
Reply
What if the girl is a rape victim?
What if they got caught in the "heat of the moment"?
What if the birth control didn't work?
It's an easy mistake to make... you shouldn't have to SUFFER for it.
It's not exactly like you're slaying someone.
Personally, if I'd get pregnant and wouldn't want the baby and wouldn't be able to get an abortion, I'd try and punch and hurt my stomach as much as possible to try and "kill" whatever is in there, and risk dying 'cause of it.
Maybe that's just me?
Personally, I reckon that the baby could hardly be called "alive" in the first months, since technically it's a parasite feeding on us.
I think we should have the right to choose.
Some people can't afford babies, or may not have the time for them, or will practically just give the baby a SHITTY LIFE, and personally I don't think we should inflict this upon some people and their technically-not-yet-existent-children.
And yes.. I know that there is abortion, but adopting someone isn't cheap either.
Reply
Adoption*.
Reply
So I hardly think people would use it as birth control, unless they're really stupid.
Reply
Because those eggs could of became "alive" just as much as our "embryos" could.
Personally, I see our "embryos" as property.
Either we keep it, or get rid of it.
Technically it isn't alive yet, which means it isn't really murder to get rid of it.
It's PREVENTING it from BECOMING alive.
Murder isn't always wrong, you ought to define what you're arguing for a bit better.
Are you a girl by the way?
Reply
The right and wrong in this argument depends on the conditions.
It practically depends on the girl who got pregnant, and the person who got her pregnant.
If the girl is homeless then it's practically WRONG not to let her have an abortion, since who knows, maybe she won't make it to a hospital and will give birth in the street and she will bleed to death?
I mean.
THINK OF THE BABY AS WELL, NOT JUST THE POOR FUCKER WHO GOT PREGNANT.
You seem to be pretty narrow-minded about this.
Reply
This is my journal and not my debate. So please continue the argument in private or on your own LJ. Thanks.
Reply
I think we both made our statements pretty clear though.
Reply
Leave a comment