Communities have more tags / upgrade tag limit with paid account

Dec 02, 2007 23:12


Title
Communities have more tags / upgrade tag limit with paid account

Short, concise description of the idea
1000 tag limit is upgraded for communities or can be raised via a paid account or an add on. Like icons.

Full description of the ideaMany communities use tags a method of keeping track of a large amount of entries from varying users. It is ( Read more... )

paid features, upgrade features, § implemented, tags, community maintenance

Leave a comment

worldserpent December 19 2007, 02:22:19 UTC
I don't know, isn't the problem not that a vast number of people have 1000 plus tags (even before the ban, it was only a tiny minority), but that when accounts with over a certain number of tags use them, the software gets overloaded and bogs down the software? On the other thread on of the LJ people said that this just was too much for the database and when they created it, they didn't anticipate that people would have that many tags and to redo it, they'd need to rewrite the tag software, which would be a major undertaking?

So, I don't think this can really solve the root of the tag issue, because a software rewrite is the only way. (If only there were a way to integrate external tagging sites such as del.icio.us into LJ. That way we could rely on another specialized site to take the load without crashing LJ.)

Reply

azurelunatic December 19 2007, 02:23:57 UTC
Hmm, you think del.icio.us integration is worth a suggestion? :-P

Reply

worldserpent December 19 2007, 03:41:55 UTC
Wasn't it already suggested awhile back?

If it wasn't, I'm not really the one to write such a suggestion, because I am not really sure what the possible limits of integration are. Since both LJ and del.icio.us use accounts, it would be hard to figure out the cookies and permissions and whatever involved in associating a del.icio.us account with an LJ one, especially for a community. So I'm not really sure what such integration would ideally look like...

Reply

azurelunatic December 19 2007, 05:12:16 UTC
Association would have to involve cooperation between the two services, but OpenID sounds ideal. Maybe OpenID and trackback? Ooo, that sounds promising, but only if the tagging services work with trackback and LJ makes it go live.

Picture this: someone sees a spiffy entry, tags it with a number of external tagging service tags, and the fact of that tagging generates a pseudo-blog-entry, which attaches itself to the post with trackback, thus associating an external service tagging it with the entry through the trackback link. Ideally, the trackback summary would show the tags, or at least the first n tags. Inside the tagging service post, you've got the entry link and the tags it's tagged with. Clicking on any of those tags gets you to all the entries anywhere that have been tagged with that tag, by that user, or by the whole tagging site.

I have yet to imagine how the OpenID authentication would add unique benefits, though.

Reply

worldserpent December 19 2007, 05:27:10 UTC
Is LJ even trying to do trackback? It's been promised for years and years, but they've not done anything I can see.

Hmm, that does sound pretty cool. See, this is why you should write the proposal. ;) I don't know if del.icio.us does that, but maybe another service does?

Reply

azurelunatic November 21 2008, 18:50:44 UTC
Hmm, looking at this after a year, this totally sounds like an OpenSocial thing of some sort -- tracking service sees bookmark, identifies what place it's coming from based on the link, *.livejournal.com/whatever, and then goes to LJ, checks with LJ via OpenSocial whether the journal owner a) has settings set for their service, and b) would like them to post a trackback or generate a notice when someone has bookmarked with them.

I'll put this in my to-post file.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up