Captcha for Paid users

May 20, 2010 02:46


Title
Captcha for Paid users

Short, concise description of the idea
Captcha for comments over 5000+ should not be applied to paid users.

Full description of the ideaI understand the need to discourage over usage so that others can use LiveJournal for free, but I also believe that paid users should retain some freedom from simple and slightly annoying ( Read more... )

paid features, captchas, comments, § no status, comment creation

Leave a comment

dobie June 15 2010, 03:06:22 UTC
-1 to this.

The catchpa is there to prevent bots form spam-flooding an entry with comments in a malicious fashion. If a Paid User's account were to become compromised, then the security feature would be useless.

It in no way impairs a real person from leaving a comment.

Reply

rebelsheart June 15 2010, 03:07:58 UTC
 

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

dobie June 15 2010, 03:30:36 UTC
Yes, but, the catchpa exists for a reason. There is no good excuse for introducing a security hole.

Reply

gerg June 15 2010, 04:23:57 UTC
Generally speaking, this is correct. I'd support removing the comment captcha for paid/perm accts.

Reply

lady_angelina June 15 2010, 06:46:40 UTC
I can understand the security concerns that the original commenter brought up. But with that said, I agree, too. As someone who frequently comments via BlackBerry, which can NOT support ReCAPTCHA at this time, I am effectively barred from posting even logged-in comments to entries containing over 5,000 comments (or at least until I get home).

So while this wouldn't solve the underlying problem of ReCAPTCHA not playing nicely with BlackBerry or other mobile devices (and there's a whole separate suggestion addressing this), it's a start.

Reply

azurelunatic June 15 2010, 09:48:08 UTC
I would be more worried about a botmaster having their bots buy accounts with stolen credit cards, myself.

Reply

trixieleitz June 16 2010, 06:06:07 UTC
CAPTCHAs do present a barrier to accessibility for some users, so your last statement is not completely accurate.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up