Every Human Being Has His Worth

Feb 28, 2009 17:47

If anyone, on any pretext whatsoever, tried to interfere with my work as a physician or educator, I'd throw him out. And if called into court, I'd ask him certain clear, simple questions that he'd be unable to answer without feeling ashamed for the rest of his life--because I'm a man who works, who knows what a human being is like inside, who ( Read more... )

personal, deep thought, in not of this world, comic thought, bpc

Leave a comment

stupidcoyote March 1 2009, 21:31:51 UTC
Maybe truth is lost in translation, maybe it's lost in expression, maybe there are too many truths and no nexus point where these truths meet in unity.

I think this is true in general, but in the specific case of what I THINK I saw, I don't think it applies. I think folks understood the questions, and the answers. I know that the question was rephrased so as to try to be clearer in case there was a misunderstanding, and the same (or similar) answers were again given. I for one, understood the questions, AND the answers. I also understood repeating the question (and thus the answer) once... maybe twice... 3 times because there were more then one person asking at that point... but even by that time, please, ur getting (what seemed to me to be) obvious lies at this point... u have backed the querant into a corner. Stop, and let them out. ... or not as ur truth tells u to do...

I have to ask (myself) tho, about the nature of rhetoric and innuendo. If I just take an expression of "truth" at face value, do the innuendos exist?

If I decide to see innuendo, does this mean the innuendo exists, and if it does, then who created it? Me, or the person who offered the expression of truth that may or may not have held in the innuendo?

What was the answer u got when u asked urself? Y put this here if it only self reflection for ur own benefit? What information do u want me to receive from these to paragraphs, just that u r thinking about these things? If all u r trying to tell me here is that u r thinking of these things, how does that apply to me?

I am trying to ask straight fwd questions to this because it seems like so much innuendo. U r trying to tell ME something otherwise u WOULDN'T put it in my blog. What r u saying... should I guess?

Some one asked a question... should I say someone or should I be straight fwd and say Petra?

When I say someone asked a question, I and I know who it is... and YOU know who it is... And everyone else who replied to this post (so far) knows who it is... what am I accomplishing by saying "someone" instead of Petra. "Hiding the names to protect the innocent"? or maybe I just don't like to see folks' names in type.

So if I ask the question, how many people from group x (¿should I say group x or group b or name the group and make this more accurate?) r listed as facilitators of rituals from Samhain 07 to Samhain 09, and I can really look at a list already available and make a pretty good guess (if not perfect at least get an accurate "range"... then y ASK the question? It seems to me there is a deeper question behind it, something that wasn't given the space to come out.

If the answer I get back from the question in the above paragraph is "none of my business" (certainly a valid truth, imo) I am going to feel shut down and cut off. Inevitably I will ask MYSELF (if not also the person who gave the answer), y should THEY think this is none of my business.

At this point, I have asked, a lead question, which by my understanding LEADS more easily to having my actual question answered or my actual concerns voiced... thus innuendo. The answer given though true, creates even MORE questions then were already in my mind (though I didn't voice them yet), and now I also want to know y, u think this is none of my business, and what u r hiding behind that curtain.

Reply

daisyrainwater March 1 2009, 22:40:57 UTC
>>What was the answer u got when u asked urself?>>

When you're talking about innuendo, the imlpication is that the response is planned and I don't ever mistake stupidity/ignorance/lack of self awareness for malice.

I think many of the people you asked direct questions to are laboring under a lack of self awareness. They think they are not a group therefore they are not a group, their perception of reality is the only truth.

I think a conspiracy exists, therefore a conspiracy must exist. The only good service to the community is the one I envision, therefore, there is no other meaningful service to the community.

See. I don't believe there is innuendo, merely someone's version of the truth.

The problem is that no one can force self awareness on another person. We can only decide if the situation presented as is, is right for us.

Reply

stupidcoyote March 2 2009, 15:36:28 UTC
>>I have to ask (myself) tho, about the nature of rhetoric and innuendo. If I just take an expression of "truth" at face value, do the innuendos exist?

If I decide to see innuendo, does this mean the innuendo exists, and if it does, then who created it? Me, or the person who offered the expression of truth that may or may not have held in the innuendo?

What was the answer u got when u asked urself? Y put this here if it is only self reflection for ur own benefit? What information do u want me to receive from these to paragraphs, just that u r thinking about these things? If all u r trying to tell me here is that u r thinking of these things, how does that apply to me?

I am trying to ask straight fwd questions to this because it seems like so much innuendo. U r trying to tell ME something otherwise u WOULDN'T put it in my blog. What r u saying... should I guess?>>

So what I was saying regarding ur quote here and through my questions regarding it is, "I don't understand what u r trying to tell me". The only option I have is to infer u meant something by ur question to urself (that is innuendo). "Can u please clarify what u were trying to tell me so I am not left with ONLY innuendo."

Ur reply above does NOT clarify what u meant by asking urself those questions in my blog and I am still only left with what u MIGHT BE implying with those questions... which u have STILL left unanswered, thus all I can do is continue believing the innuendo whether it is there or not.

Please clarify ur meaning so I can move fwd with this conversation... or just abandon the conversation if that is where u r. If u choose to abandon the conversation, I will not hold it against u, but I WILL continue with my OWN meaning for the innuendo I created for ur words.

Reply

daisyrainwater March 2 2009, 15:46:32 UTC
I honestly have no idea what you're saying. Sorry.

Reply

stupidcoyote March 2 2009, 18:58:39 UTC
I am asking u to clarify what u were trying to get across to me when u said,

I have to ask (myself) tho, about the nature of rhetoric and innuendo. If I just take an expression of "truth" at face value, do the innuendos exist?

If I decide to see innuendo, does this mean the innuendo exists, and if it does, then who created it? Me, or the person who offered the expression of truth that may or may not have held in the innuendo?

and I asked u specific questions, which r in 2 places above so I won't repeat them, in hopes u would see how it was confusing to me. If u want to answer those questions directly it MAY be helpful... or maybe u can just clarify what u meant.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up