Leave a comment

whitetestament April 19 2008, 21:37:23 UTC
It must be quite a pleasure to live in so idyllic a world as to sincerely believe that conflict can be ended. And what then? What of those quashed under the heavy hand of "peacekeeping?" Will they not turn against their masters? Such brilliant hypocrisy...!

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 22:00:19 UTC
Indeed. It seems to me they could only make the problems here more complex by not allowing others to mitigate their problems for themselves.

... Do I know you?

Reply

whitetestament April 19 2008, 22:08:36 UTC
Those who were brought into the world as tools of war can attest to the impossibility of separating themselves from the very conflict they sought to extinguish.

I don't believe you do.

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 22:30:39 UTC
You were a soldier, then.
Yes. Those who are bred for war can, inevitably, only know war. Even when I was no longer a student of Mathiu's, my mind remained on tactics and strategy. It's how I got by successfully as a trader, with those transferable skills.

Your name?

Reply

whitetestament April 19 2008, 22:37:07 UTC
Weapon might be more precise! To deny one's own nature is fruitless; pitiful. He tried to do the same. How hard-learned the truth was!

...Albedo.

Reply

makarovs_pewpew April 19 2008, 22:38:40 UTC
He's starting to notice that Albedo is kind of nucking futs. strategy_master April 19 2008, 22:38:53 UTC
... You were conditioned, then.
"He"?

... Shu.

Reply

covert_chord April 19 2008, 22:51:52 UTC
Are you trying to say that without war, those "bred" for it won't be able to function in a peaceful society, then?

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 22:53:12 UTC
I believe that those bred for war never forget what they've learned. I believe they find their own methods of implementing what they've learned, because it is all they know, because they can't get away from it.

That's within my experience.

Reply

covert_chord April 19 2008, 22:54:19 UTC
Negatively or positively implementing it?

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 22:56:09 UTC
It's applicable to you, isn't it?

Reply

covert_chord April 19 2008, 23:00:03 UTC
You're avoiding my question. Answer it.

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 23:01:16 UTC
As are you. The answer to your question is irrelevant; I'm not going into detail because I feel no need to differentiate. The general observation is applicable, isn't it.

Reply

covert_chord April 19 2008, 23:05:18 UTC
There is a difference between using the skills one has learned in a different fashion to benefit society and people in general, and falling slave to those very skills, unable to change and only being able to cause damage in the long run.

Reply

strategy_master April 19 2008, 23:07:55 UTC
Do you see it as slavery to do what fulfills one the most? Even if you're designed to do something, is it so terrible to accept it and do it, if that is the only way you can be satisfied?

To me, it's no different than choosing your own path. The option is always there. Taking it or not taking it is also a choice made.

Reply

covert_chord April 19 2008, 23:09:52 UTC
...Not if those skills only lead to the deaths of others.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up