Erebus, Chaos, and the definitions that are exsistance...
In conflict we find definiton, and in definiton we find...
Conflict.
The moment I come to define something, it is immedietly challanged. I then defend my definition based on other things I have defined. When I see something, I define it, when I feel some thing, I define it. That is how the human mind works. It defines and catigorized in order to understand.
And so I ask why.
To find this answer, to understand this answer I would need to define, right? That escapes the purpous.
What is there without definition? Stuff. There is masses of uncatigorazed stuff with no definition.
Which is a definition.
Then what is definition? And wat is there without definition.
Something I cannot define.
A paradox. The answer exsists in a paradox.
In order to find this answer, I cannot define things. I cannot define things using other definitions, and I cannopt catigorize them in my mind. This dose not leave me with a definition or a thought, but an emotion. Definition is an emotion, and thus everything we use to define is an emotion.
Evil is an emotion
Good is an emotion
Wrong is an emotion
Right is an emotion.
Want is the only thing we understaznd without definition, because we do not define it by something else. I either want it or I don't want it, but want is inatly human. The only thing we do not need to define.
Emotion is based off of want. Whether we get or do not get what we want. I am happy when I get what I want. I'm sad when I do not et what I want. Wants are abstract or concrte. I want food. I eat food, my body is happy, and I feel full. I don't eat food, my body is unhappy and I feel pain. I don't want to be hurt. I don't get hurt, and my body is happy and I feel pleasure. such as from a slik pillow or a comfotable something or other. I get hurt and my body is unhappy and I feel pain.
Abstact wants are another thing. I want the know. I think I know, and I am happy(satisfied). I realize I don't know, and I am unhappy (unsatisfied). I want to feel love. I feel it and I am happy. I don't feel it and I am unhappy.
Conflict is getting what you want. I argue so I can define, so I can get an answer. I get angry so I can argue. I want love. I love so I can define what I want, and I hate so I can define what I want. Id I dn't hate, and I don't love, I am unhappy, and so disatisfied, and so incompletle and so I get angry so that I can get what I want.
Everything is a tool.
I want. Give it to me. No? Then I'll take it.
Where do we get food? from other things. We eat them. Yum.
Where to we get knowlage? from other things. We pick them a part. Fun.
We have nothing that we did not take from something or someone else, whether it was given freely (dear lies down in frount of you) or not (dear tried to run)
Things are given freely because another want out ways the want of posetion. I want an apple more then a steak. I want food to live, and steak is food, but I want the apple more. So I give you my steak to get the apple. Yay, and apple. Absrtactly, I want to define change. You want to define distruction. We argue and define them as something together. Yay, a definition.
However, these exchanged do not have to be just with two abstracts and two concretes. At all.
The dear wants to define itself as a good creature. It wants to sacrifice itself for another over its desire to live. You want the dear for dinner. The dear lies down in frount of you. You eat it. Yay.
However, things are not always given freely. I want the apple. You want the apple. I take the apple. You take it back. We fight. One of us wins, the other loses. I win, yay. I lose, fuck.
That all applys every where else.
That was very black and white. However, I want the apple equal to the steak, you want the steak so you won't give me the appe without the steak. We fight. I win or lose.
There are an infinate amout of greys, and I, even after 18 hours of sleep, still need to sleep, because I am sick and I am not happy about it, and I want to get better more then I want to continue explaning inexhaustable amounts of situation with an apple and a steak, and a dear and abstract and all that other blah.
I have made my point sufficantly for now.
In everything there is darkness in light, because we can define them that way.
Conflict.
The moment I come to define something, it is immedietly challanged. I then defend my definition based on other things I have defined. When I see something, I define it, when I feel some thing, I define it. That is how the human mind works. It defines and catigorized in order to understand.
And so I ask why.
To find this answer, to understand this answer I would need to define, right? That escapes the purpous.
What is there without definition? Stuff. There is masses of uncatigorazed stuff with no definition.
Which is a definition.
Then what is definition? And wat is there without definition.
Something I cannot define.
A paradox. The answer exsists in a paradox.
In order to find this answer, I cannot define things. I cannot define things using other definitions, and I cannopt catigorize them in my mind. This dose not leave me with a definition or a thought, but an emotion. Definition is an emotion, and thus everything we use to define is an emotion.
Evil is an emotion
Good is an emotion
Wrong is an emotion
Right is an emotion.
Want is the only thing we understaznd without definition, because we do not define it by something else. I either want it or I don't want it, but want is inatly human. The only thing we do not need to define.
Emotion is based off of want. Whether we get or do not get what we want. I am happy when I get what I want. I'm sad when I do not et what I want. Wants are abstract or concrte. I want food. I eat food, my body is happy, and I feel full. I don't eat food, my body is unhappy and I feel pain. I don't want to be hurt. I don't get hurt, and my body is happy and I feel pleasure. such as from a slik pillow or a comfotable something or other. I get hurt and my body is unhappy and I feel pain.
Abstact wants are another thing. I want the know. I think I know, and I am happy(satisfied). I realize I don't know, and I am unhappy (unsatisfied). I want to feel love. I feel it and I am happy. I don't feel it and I am unhappy.
Conflict is getting what you want. I argue so I can define, so I can get an answer. I get angry so I can argue. I want love. I love so I can define what I want, and I hate so I can define what I want. Id I dn't hate, and I don't love, I am unhappy, and so disatisfied, and so incompletle and so I get angry so that I can get what I want.
Everything is a tool.
I want. Give it to me. No? Then I'll take it.
Where do we get food? from other things. We eat them. Yum.
Where to we get knowlage? from other things. We pick them a part. Fun.
We have nothing that we did not take from something or someone else, whether it was given freely (dear lies down in frount of you) or not (dear tried to run)
Things are given freely because another want out ways the want of posetion. I want an apple more then a steak. I want food to live, and steak is food, but I want the apple more. So I give you my steak to get the apple. Yay, and apple. Absrtactly, I want to define change. You want to define distruction. We argue and define them as something together. Yay, a definition.
However, these exchanged do not have to be just with two abstracts and two concretes. At all.
The dear wants to define itself as a good creature. It wants to sacrifice itself for another over its desire to live. You want the dear for dinner. The dear lies down in frount of you. You eat it. Yay.
However, things are not always given freely. I want the apple. You want the apple. I take the apple. You take it back. We fight. One of us wins, the other loses. I win, yay. I lose, fuck.
That all applys every where else.
That was very black and white. However, I want the apple equal to the steak, you want the steak so you won't give me the appe without the steak. We fight. I win or lose.
There are an infinate amout of greys, and I, even after 18 hours of sleep, still need to sleep, because I am sick and I am not happy about it, and I want to get better more then I want to continue explaning inexhaustable amounts of situation with an apple and a steak, and a dear and abstract and all that other blah.
I have made my point sufficantly for now.
In everything there is darkness in light, because we can define them that way.