There is a preoccupation of "how to mske it intriguing" that makes the whole thing un-naturally over-serious, thus tedious and predictable. I know it's supposed to be a "disturbing" scene and topic, but I am more irate than disturbed "-/ afterwards, because of how they do it.
Now, if she was to bend down and suckle on whatever cum that comes out of him and, then lays her head down next to him, I would have been willing to buy more. And I'm not just saying that to be provocative. I think the detailing of the act(s) of a deranged person needs to be there in that kind of scene and film topic.
I don't think it's the kind of movie Americans should make. Maybe Roman Polanski, or someone who's immune to this consciousness of sexual taboo and social degeneracy (of the rich) which so typical of, because it's so deeply-rooted in American culture.
Gossiping of the rich has never been a strong attraction to me. I can write a tome or 2 about the stories I heard during the years at my shop Island in Houston. They're often more banal than intriguing.
Isherwood is a little bit different. He ran with them but I don't think ever became them, did he? Even if he seemed a lot duller than Tennessee Williams or Gore Vidal, none of these people ever became part of the banal rich. They only ran with them.
http://video.aol.ca/video-detail/julianne-moore-having-sex-savage-grace/249935815/?icid=VIDURVMOV06
There is a preoccupation of "how to mske it intriguing" that makes the whole thing un-naturally over-serious, thus tedious and predictable. I know it's supposed to be a "disturbing" scene and topic, but I am more irate than disturbed "-/ afterwards, because of how they do it.
Now, if she was to bend down and suckle on whatever cum that comes out of him and, then lays her head down next to him, I would have been willing to buy more. And I'm not just saying that to be provocative. I think the detailing of the act(s) of a deranged person needs to be there in that kind of scene and film topic.
I don't think it's the kind of movie Americans should make. Maybe Roman Polanski, or someone who's immune to this consciousness of sexual taboo and social degeneracy (of the rich) which so typical of, because it's so deeply-rooted in American culture.
Gossiping of the rich has never been a strong attraction to me. I can write a tome or 2 about the stories I heard during the years at my shop Island in Houston. They're often more banal than intriguing.
Isherwood is a little bit different. He ran with them but I don't think ever became them, did he? Even if he seemed a lot duller than Tennessee Williams or Gore Vidal, none of these people ever became part of the banal rich. They only ran with them.
Do you know what I mean?
Anyhoo... :-.p
Reply
Leave a comment