As many of you may be aware, President Bush recently
appointed Harriet Miers to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. With this decision I am afraid that the President just lost the Iraq War. As always, a lengthy explanation lurks below the cut.
(
Read more... )
Comments 55
(The comment has been removed)
Glad you found this useful.
-Nick
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Not at all. In fact, I don't think that the late Chief Justice Rehnquist was ever a judge at any level. Mostly you just have to be a lawyer that the President likes and the Senate will confirm. Which is why there have been quite a few ex-politicians appointed, such as Earl Warren (governor of California during WWII).
-Nick
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I have no idea. It's still possible that the President might pull this one out. He's surprised me before. It's also possible that events on the battlefield are going well enough that even if we have to leave ahead of schedule the Iraqis will still be able to handle the terrorists and deter opportunistic foreigners.
If not, then maybe civil war? Iranian or Syrian intervention? A general regional war? Massive floods of refugees and death camps, like after the fall of Saigon? I don't know, but thinking along this line you get to scary, scary places really fast.
In my more optimistic moments, I like to think that even if everything goes completely, horribly wrong after a withdrawal, the Iraqis will still come out on top. After all, free men fight better and harder than slaves. And in that case the Iraqis could be justifiably proud of themselves as being the first Arab nation to earn their freedom. That would break the Arab cycle of despair more effectively than anything. But I wouldn't bet too heavily on it.
-Nick
Reply
Support of this statement however:
"So the President can't publicly state the real rationale for the war, which is to defuse Arab Islamic hatred of modernity by forcibly introducing them to liberal democracy"
I find to be disgustingly imperialist, morally and politically. Not only is the goal of "defusing Islamic hatred of modernity" a morally self-righteous goal, but forcibly introducing them to liberal democracy as a solution takes this a step further. I find the entire thing overtly and unconcernedly arrogant. No offense, but it reminds me why I would never turn to you with concern over any type of moral issue. You may feel the same way.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
The problem is mostly that they don't know her, and given the history of Republican appointments, they don't trust anyone they don't know. And now they aren't sure they trust the President.
-Nick
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment