(no subject)
Not that I have any objection to the result of the case, but has anybody tried projecting the ban on laws of moral disapproval as a general principle?
The item that comes first to mind is animal cruelty laws. However much one might hate the idea of, say, microwaving live cats to death, what's the state's rational interest in preventing such behavior, under the new standard?
The item that comes first to mind is animal cruelty laws. However much one might hate the idea of, say, microwaving live cats to death, what's the state's rational interest in preventing such behavior, under the new standard?