So as a follow-up to the much-loved previous post:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0506240150jun24,1,7295148.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed It seems all that talk about inclusion of digital property as key to property rights in general is moot. Now even your own home is not considered sovereign if someone wants to put a Kum & Go on that spot.